David Mandl on Fri, 26 May 2000 11:02:07 +0200 (CEST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
[Nettime-bold] "Most titles they stock serve essentially as wallpaper" |
NEW YORK (AP) -- The rise of superstores in the 1990s has helped best-selling books at the expense of less commercial, more literary works, according to a study commissioned by the Authors Guild. In 1986, best-selling hardcover titles accounted for about 7 percent of all hardcover sales, according to the 59-page report released Thursday. By 1996, that figure had nearly doubled, to 13 percent. ``The dramatic advent of superstores and online booksellers has made the book business more like the rest of consumer retailing: There is a smaller number of bigger winners than there used to be,'' said author Nicholas Lemann, chair of the guild's Midlist Study Group. Superstores such as Borders and Barnes & Noble, which usually have much more space than independent sellers, are credited with offering a greater variety of ``midlist'' titles. They're also criticized for favoring high-profile books and large publishers. ``A close look at superstore sales patterns suggests that most titles they stock serve essentially as wallpaper,'' the study says. ``If there is a single reason why midlist book sales are lagging, it is the chains' merchandising policies.'' The report is at: http://www.authorsguild.org/prmidlist.html -- Dave Mandl dmandl@panix.com davem@wfmu.org http://www.wfmu.org/~davem _______________________________________________ Nettime-bold mailing list Nettime-bold@nettime.org http://www.nettime.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nettime-bold