molly hankwitz on 15 Nov 2000 01:09:05 -0000 |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
[Nettime-bold] cell/mobile debate |
Responding to some comments about phone usage in the usa and mobile phone usage there... some points of interest: a) common usage among people in the bay area (west coast) has terms such as 'mobile' and 'cell' being used very frequently. to call one's own phone, 'cellphone' is not as common as hearing it referred to as 'my mobile' or my 'cell' --"you can always reach me on my cell" one also hears a lot of "cellular phones" but this from more official language such as newspapers and police reports. b) local calls are charged in many parts of the usa. in the bay area they are charged higher for business phones and at a lower-rate for residential phones. (then for day, evening and night rates) i don't know if other countries have this breakdown according to business and residential...i would be interested to know. there is also a fantastic feature of PacBell, the leading phone company and ex-monopoly phone company in Northern California...they have something called a Universal Help Line, I think that's the name, which is for low-income, ill and elderly people...it has a basic monthly billing cost of only $10.00 almost half of any other type of account and calls are charged at an extremely low-rate. This was designed to ensure( especially isolated people) access to the "outside"world at a respectful rate. There are many little phone companies cropping up all over the us which are competing in service and prices to the bigger companies like MCI, AT&T and others. Their overall ad "schtick" is to compete with prices and be less oriented towards "giveaways" and paper wastage. As it makes no difference which state you are in for which service you use, you can use a company in Massachusetts that is cheaper than those in California, from California, for example. This competition has been a fairly recent phenomenon. c) I really don't think that the mobile phone user in the states, at least in urban areas is so uncommon or "rare". these statistics mentioned would have to be measured against populations overall and the size of countries and relative urban populations, i think. where do the users generally live in the usa, and so forth...i think that the issue of overhearing phone conversations, particularly in the era of Scanner and Negativeland sampling, is not only strange at first, but humorous because it has long been thought that most phone calls were made "in private"--- curiously, the sense that no one is listening, is part of this, Wark's article suggested ...this oblivious aspect seems relative to the kinds of spaces in which people are having the conversations. maybe phones, like cigarettes in san francisco, will be outlawed in certain kinds of spaces and the street will be/remain the respository of mobile life??? Hope this helps. Molly errata: SFNet, the cafe net, was 25 cents for ten minutes, not an hour. a little less utopian than we thought. my apologies for the mistake. mh:>) _______________________________________________ Nettime-bold mailing list Nettime-bold@nettime.org http://www.nettime.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nettime-bold