josh zeidner on Thu, 12 Jul 2001 07:09:04 +0200 (CEST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
[Nettime-bold] Have We Not Learned Anything From the 90s? OR, "abort, retry, fail; the end of the cyber ethic" |
hello all, It surprises me to see so many still cleaving to the idea that the internet will somehow democratize society and lead us to some kind of mythic utopia in the near future. It seems to me that this experiment has been carried out to its fullest extent in the past 10+ years, resulting in a resounding "NO DICE"( to use the endemic NY expression ). I find it dissapointing to the point of absurdity that people are still getting jazzed about things such as faster bandwidth( why should i spend thousands of dollars so I can watch TV on my computer?! ). As if I wanted to spend 30$/month for a high speed connection so I can recieve 20X the number of ad banners I normally recieve( or i could revel in pornographic gluttony ). Does anyone out there besides me find themselves spend frustrating hours in front of the net desperately searching for something interesting? The idealism of the net has completely disintegrated in the wake of its commercialization. Now, the internet is no more interesting than TV, actually it differentiates itself by actually being MORE annoying than TV. And any attempts to make it interesting inevitably fail in much the same way as our Public Access TV does( dont get me wrong I like The Thing, as much as I like PBS, much respect to WS and RM ). This dream, that we can craft a tool for communication that cannot be corrupted, was the naive and futile dream of the young generation who had literally nothing to hope for. Now we are in a phase that is involving the re-phrasing of the original ideas, with the hopes that they may take hold THIS time. Terms like "Peer-To-Peer" leave me thinking: wasnt that the idea in the first place? Exactly how is that different from what we have been trying for all along? Virtual reality was another great one( which is inevitably complementary to increasing bandwidth ). This idea that we can immerse ourselves in informational worlds of our own creation, and tickle each others nerve endings without concern for geographical boundaries. What is wrong with this? To mistake the images of our own dreams for reality is the most fatal kind of narcissism that we can effect. Praying to the idol of Virtual Reality will only lead to a complete mental poverty. Virtual Reality is nothing more than a system to shield us from REALITY, the reality where people live and die and sometimes effect these events through thier own actions. I think it is important that we( everyone, the world, ect ) move on. There is no technology that we can create that will make a better world for us( some still think otherwise, and are decending into a highly technical and complex theoretical territory ). This doesnt mean that technology is bad. and "the internet is not going away". What we should know however, is that technology should be subordinate to humankind, and the technologies alone should never dictate our lifestyles or governments. I imagine that this would( or could ) be part of our accepted ideals in the 21st century. well ive had my say... josh zeidner __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/ _______________________________________________ Nettime-bold mailing list Nettime-bold@nettime.org http://www.nettime.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nettime-bold