Benjamin Geer on Tue, 9 Jul 2002 02:46:01 +0200 (CEST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
[Nettime-bold] Re: <nettime> stiglitz is not the second digest [geer, hart] |
On Tuesday 09 Jul 2002 00:13, ben moretti wrote: > Naively I believe that the progressives in countries with much to > struggle against, Brazil etc, are more easily able to achieve > constructive things. I think the Sem Terra movement has chosen an issue on which direct action can really work. Poor farmers need land. There's lots of unused land going to waste. So they occupy it. Of course there's a lot more to it than that (good planning and organisation, popular education, legal battles, alliances with other movements, etc.), but in essence, that's how direct action is supposed to work: the action itself contributes directly to solving the problem; its value isn't merely symbolic or rhetorical. It's not too hard to see how to do that with land. It's harder to see how to do it with financial markets, trade, or public services. > Anyway, I think if the progressives in the West stopped talking so much > about "stuff" and did some simple things, such as teaching computers to > refugees or working at a women's shelter, then they would feel like > they had more integration, as you say, with their theoretical chit > chat. OK, but how do you integrate the two? In addition to helping organise public political chit-chat events, I could spend time teaching computers to refugees, etc. I would learn more about the problems faced by refugees, and the refugees would learn about computers. But how do you build a political movement out of that? The Sem Terra movement isn't just obtaining land for farmers; it's also building political consciousness. By carrying out these collective actions, the farmers learn how to size up the balance of forces in a particular situation, challenge their government, and win. Surely that's a far cry from the individual refugee learning to use Microsoft Word (horrors!) in order to get a job. So how, in the West, do you integrate small-scale work, meant to remedy immediate individual problems, with a political project? I'm not saying it can't be done; but it needs a strategy. Is there anyone who is doing this effectively? Ben _______________________________________________ Nettime-bold mailing list Nettime-bold@nettime.org http://amsterdam.nettime.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nettime-bold