Nmherman on Wed, 17 Jul 2002 22:57:01 +0200 (CEST)


[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

[Nettime-bold] Re: <nettime> Deflation, anyone?


In a message dated 7/17/2002 3:48:51 PM Central Daylight Time, morlockelloi@yahoo.com writes:


> in the late nineteenth and very early twentieth century I mean, could
> only be absorbed by the "creative destruction" of two World Wars,
> then you can measure the stakes of the game that's being played out,

Let's be practical.

What is the best place to be, in the medium run, 3-5 years, when the WW3 starts
?

(WW being defined as pruning some 3-5% population of the industrialised
countries).

Best place means low probability of getting killed (say, below 0.1%),
uninterrupted food supply (in exchange for a service since money will be
worthless) and an internet connection.



When the shit comes down, I'll be headed here at a hundred and ten per--Unless I can get a sit-down with Nesmith and save the world:

http://www.northwest-national.com/11-2pg.htm  (I own there.)

Harry Dean
genius2000.net

++