Soenke Zehle on Wed, 24 Jul 2002 23:34:01 +0200 (CEST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
[Nettime-bold] No Small Matter: The Dangers of Nanotech Particles |
From: etc@etcgroup.org The ETC Group announces the release of a new, 8-page Communique entitled, "No Small Matter: Nanotech Particles Penetrate Living Cells and Accumulate in Animal Organs." The full text of "No Small Matter" is available on the ETC website: http://www.etcgroup.org Discussions of the potential dangers of nanotechnology (that is, manipulating matter on the scale of the nanometer, one billionth of a meter) have been carried out in the realm of theory or in the safe, fictional realm of Hollywood movies: will scientists someday be able to create self-assembling nanobots programmed to produce commercial goods and food and new forms of life? What might happen if they do? There has been virtually no discussion, however, of the potential danger of today's applied nanotechnology (that is, manipulating matter on the scale of the nanometer to produce useful materials)--until now. Researchers have just begun to ask the most basic questions about the impact of new nano-materials on human health and the environment. Evidence of nanoparticle contamination in living organisms and unanswered questions about potential dangers of new forms of carbon require urgent societal review. Summary: Issue: At a mid-March fact-finding meeting at the US EnvironmentalProtection Agency (EPA), researchers reported that nanoparticles are showing up in the livers of research animals, can seep into living cells, and perhaps piggyback on bacteria to enter the food chain. The commercial use of nanoscale carbon was likened to either "the next best thing to sliced bread or the next asbestos." Despite these revelations, there is no regulatory body (and no plans for one) dedicated to overseeing this potent and powerfully invasive new technology. Context: Touted as the greenest and greatest techno-fix ever, proponents claim that these atomic-scale manipulations will solve our environmental woes and guarantee - not only sustainable, but perpetual - development. Nanotechnology is the manipulation of matter, working with elements in the Periodic Table (atoms and atom clusters [molecules] in the range of a nanometer [nm], one billionth of a meter). At the nanoscale, atoms function in the fabled realm of quantum physics, where ordinary elements can exhibit extraordinary strength, temperature tolerance, colors, chemical reactivity, and electrical conductivity - characteristics inconceivable at micro or macro scales. Companies are already cranking out tons of commercial nanomaterials for use as catalysts, in cosmetics, paints, coatings, fabrics, and to provide added strength. Some of the materials are familiar compounds that have never before been marketed on the nanoscale; other materials are atomically-modified elements that do not exist in nature. Some new forms of carbon (a component of all living things) - called nanotubes and fullerenes - are being manufactured for the first time and their impact on the environment is unknown. Implications: Nanotechnology - including nanobiotechnology - has been pegged by industry and governments to become the world's largest and fastest industrial revolution - dwarfing history's past technological upheavals. More than 450 dedicated nanotech enterprises are already in the marketplace manufacturing a host of "old-nano" products (e.g., particles used in cosmetics and sprays) and "new-nano" products (e.g., chips, sensors and new forms of carbon). Global R & D spending is at US$4 billion. The US National Science Foundation predicts that within ten years the entire semiconductor industry and half of the pharmaceutical industry will rely on nanotechnology and that, by 2015, the global market will be US$1 trillion. Industry will fight hard to make sure that health and environmental concerns do not derail the progress of nanotech, as has happened with biotech. Policy: Because nanotech generally works with the elemental building blocks of life - rather than with life directly - it has largely evaded social, political and regulatory scrutiny. The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has thus far established no policies or protocols for considering the safety of nano-particles in products already on the market. Given the concerns raised over nanoparticle contamination in living organisms, Heads of State attending the World Summit on Sustainable Development in Johannesburg (Aug. 26-Sept. 4, 2002) should declare an immediate moratorium on commercial production of new nanomaterials and launch a transparent global process for evaluating the socio-economic, health and environmental implications of the technology. _______________________________________________ Nettime-bold mailing list Nettime-bold@nettime.org http://amsterdam.nettime.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nettime-bold