McKenzie Wark on Wed, 14 Jun 2000 18:06:37 +0200 (CEST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: <nettime> [talk given at tulipomania dotcom] |
Ted, you are extrapolating wildly here. I never said anything about exlusion or charging students more. You're just making stuff up there. You might notice there's a lot of universities that treat their student accomodation or even their parking lots as 'profit centres', and charge students accordingly. But they're happy for the intellectual property of their staff to be given away free. More autonomy for intellectual workers, less price guaging by the rentiers of the plant and equipment, i say. Of course its just not the case that all students are poor downtrodden sods with no capacity to pay. many will have lifetime earnings far above their teachers. Scholarships and loans can level the field and create inclusion. If you're charging those who can afford it, you can subsidise those who can't. A mixed economy, in other words. Inclusion in what? This is crucial thing here. Inclusion in a situation where institutions, be they universities or publishers or museums get to accumulate intellectual property and generate revenue from it at the expense of the direct producer. The alternative? More autonomy for direct producers, so there is something to include people in. Something that provides income for intellectual work based on a limited but defensible property right. k __________________________________________ "We no longer have roots, we have aerials." http://www.mcs.mq.edu.au/~mwark -- McKenzie Wark # distributed via <nettime>: no commercial use without permission # <nettime> is a moderated mailing list for net criticism, # collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets # more info: majordomo@bbs.thing.net and "info nettime-l" in the msg body # archive: http://www.nettime.org contact: nettime@bbs.thing.net