Jonathan Prince on 31 Jan 2001 04:15:44 -0000 |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
<nettime> DC Police Infiltrate Inauguration Protestors |
Police Infiltrate Private Gathering of Inauguration Protestors in Adams Morgan, Washington DC http://www.intowner.com/ The InTowner from January 2001 issue By David Barrows On the evening of Wednesday, December 20, a small gathering of planners for the "InaugurAuction," to be held on Inauguration Day, was getting underway in a private Adams Morgan apartment when it was interrupted by a uninvited, late arrival. The well-built, dark-haired man in his late twenties or his early thirties of sallow complexion with a goatee looked familiar, and was soon asked to take a look at a computer screen where an image bearing a strong resemblance to him had been pulled up from a file. That image--his image--had been captured on a video taken during the protests at the time of last April's International Monetary Fund (IMF) meeting here in DC. (See, "Twisted Priorities? Police Actions During IMF Protests Protested," InTowner, May 2000, page 1.). The computer belonged to the host of the private gathering, Adam Eidinger, who is among the principal organizers of the InaugurAuction. Looking at the uninvited guest, individuals were already noticing similarities in the hairline and the scar-like blemish on his cheek matching that seen in the image displayed on the computer. The activist poet Elizabeth Croydon had already introduced herself, and he had introduced himself to her as "Nick." As she recalled, his voice seemed to her to smack a bit of New York, but he told her he was from Montreal, Canada. When Croydon did the usual, "Parlez-vous Français?," his response was, "Oh, no." She then said "un peu?" using fingers to signify "a little bit," and he answered, "No, not a lick." Many recognized the man as having been present at the large planning meeting for the InaugurAuction which had been held at the George Washington University Law School two days prior, on December 18. He was remembered for having interrupted that meeting with side talk. However, here in Eidinger's apartment he meekly professed his innocence. When confronted, this man, who had introduced himself as Nick Ferry, could not, or would not, produce any identification. Eidinger then asked "Nick" if he would mind posing for a snapshot. Seeming slightly surprised, he agreed, and a few pictures were taken by the host. He was then asked to leave the apartment. "Nick" was also told that if he planned to return to the large planning meetings at the law school, he would need to bring identification. His response was that he could not guarantee his being able to bring identification, but that he got the message. After his departure, a few people commented that they suspected that there were at least a couple of other police infiltrators present at the large planning meetings. The computer image came from video taken last April when an IMF demonstrator, identified as James Price, was being beaten while his arms were being yanked from behind with several officers participating. As the face of the officer straddling the demonstrator rose up from the victim whose face was against the sidewalk, the officer looks directly into the camera and becomes recognizable as being none other than "Nick." (This incident, and this undercover officer's involvement in the arrest last spring of James Price, is documented at www.sinkers.org.) The day after the infiltrator's visit, Eidinger participated in a press conference to announce plans for the counter-inauguration protests, carried by C-SPAN, held at the Stewart Mott House on Capitol Hill. He joined several other spokespeople, including George Ripley of the Alliance for Democracy, as well as Brian Becker of the New York chapter of the International Action Center who had recently been cleared of a felony charge stemming from last April's IMF protests. (The case was thrown out of court by the presiding judge, due in part to a police officer's hearsay evidence, according to lawyer Mark Goldstone, who also told The InTowner that he is unaware of any of the felony charges leveled against last April's demonstrators as having been upheld.) Facing eight television cameras, and being recorded for radio, Eidinger re-told the previous evening's incident and offered proof of the officer's infiltration. In a room adjoining the press conference he had his computer set up with images of the last April's incident of police brutality featuring the same man who is revealed in the photograph taken the evening before at the apartment. All the members of the press in attendance were urged to compare. According to a Washington Post story of December 28, DC Chief of Police Charles Ramsey and Executive Assistant Chief Terrence Gainer are expecting "5,000 hooligans" to join in the protests and are already calling 1,500 officers into a refresher course for crowd control. Last April, the District's police districts were left mostly abandoned while officers were being drilled in skills they are now being questioned about and sued over, including alleged illegal seizure of political literature and puppets, food and medical supplies under false pretexts of evidence from a legal warehouse building on Florida Avenue which had served as the demonstrators' headquarters. This so-called "Convergence Center" that was closed down by the police was also where two, mild-mannered women volunteers, who fully cooperated with the police, were themselves arrested. Felony charges against them were dismissed immediately by judges before trial. Further, charges by the police department of Molotov cocktail preparation and pepper spray makings that made such a splash on local network news were later rescinded by the police. The police department has acknowledged that it is currently infiltrating groups that are organizing Inauguration Day protests. When The InTowner asked Reverend Walter Fauntroy, who has obtained a permit for a massive protest on January 20 in Stanton Park, if he had concerns about infiltration, he replied, "We have come to expect that." The police department has refused to confirm or deny whether there was an infiltrator at Adam Eidinger's apartment. When a Washington Post reporter specifically confronted Chief Gainer regarding Eidinger's complaint about the infiltrator, Gainer responded, "What nefarious things are they up to that they need to keep tabs on police?" All participants in the InaugurAuction meetings have unanimously voted for the rules of non-violent protest: not to use violent language nor engage in either vandalism or any other destruction of property. As reported last fall by this newspaper ("ACLU Lawsuit Exposes Serious DC Police, Fed Constitutional Wrongs," InTowner, September 2000, page 1), Chief Ramsey is among those named as defendants in a massive lawsuit brought by the DC chapter of the American Civil Liberties Union and the New York chapter of the National Lawyers Guild, among the more prominent law groups. Other defendants included the FBI, U.S. Park Service, U.S. Secret Service, the Treasury Department's Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms, and the DC Corporation Counsel--all for having violated both the First and Fourth Amendments, among other charges. Regarding this lawsuit, Goldstone, who, following last spring's IMF demonstrations, defended Brian Becker and the two ladies who had been arrested at the demonstrators' Florida Avenue headquarters, provided The InTowner with the following statement: "Based on 15 people who broke windows in Seattle in November 1999 [during the fall meeting of the IMF], the DC police, in cooperation with numerous other police and law enforcement agencies, decided that it wasn't going to happen in DC. They were not going to allow the demonstrators to achieve their stated goal of 'shutting down the World Bank and the IMF' on April 16, 2000. So, they conspired to deprive them of their cherished First Amendment right to speak, to gather, to protest. They did so by military-style tactics, intimidation, surveillance, infiltration, disinformation, unconstitutional pre-emptive and pretextual arrests. It was sad to watch how quickly everyone accommodated themselves to this new police state so quickly--and allowed the actions of the few in Seattle to give the police an excuse to turn our nation's capital into an armed camp--with a suspension of civil liberties and the Constitution." DC Police Actions Seen Part of Larger Pattern Shortly after police infiltrator "Nick" had left the Adams Morgan apartment, Eidinger revealed to the group how, when he had been protesting the Republican national convention in Philadelphia last August, he and several fellow demonstrators had been arrested by an undercover policeman who was posing as a member of Adam's group and was driving their van, and that he had been imprisoned for 10 days before he could participate in the anti-death penalty rally at the Republican convention. (So far, all felony charges connected with the Philadelphia protesters have been dropped when finally coming to a hearing.) Eidinger was to later tell this reporter that their 15-foot-tall skeletal puppets, which took months to make and which cost them lots of money in materials, were thrown into trucks never to be returned. Their literature, expensively printed, was destroyed by the police. Pennsylvania state troopers have acknowledged infiltration, even though Philadelphia does not permit its police to infiltrate organizations. According to a report issued by the Seattle chapter of the National Lawyers Guild, "Waging War on Dissent" (available from the National Lawyers Guild's website, www.nlg.org), which compares police actions against demonstrators in Eugene (Oregon), Seattle, Los Angeles, Philadelphia and Washington, DC--among other cities, the FBI and other law enforcement agencies, having successfully concluded their efforts to go after the militant right-wing groups, have been for the past year turning their energies toward peaceful protest groups on the left, while using their new militarized "armor" of chemical sprays and tear gas grenades. Concluded the report's author: "A disturbing trend is developing regarding police pre-emptive response to mass protest. In numerous situations since the protests against the World Trade Organization in Seattle in late 1999, police have issued misinformation claiming unsubstantiated evidence of violent plans by protesters gathering for mass actions. The false information is then used as a pretext for unwarranted police actions. "The misinformation concerning protester plans have ranged from chemical weapons to bomb making. None of the claims of violent plans have been substantiated. Nonetheless, many media outlets appear to have been predisposed to repeat information provided by police without fact-checking or seeking responses from the organizations accused." The writer concluded that the introduction of this false evidence enables the police to sabotage the protesters' plans and to confiscate their literature. -- .. Jonathan Prince jonathan@killyourtv.com http://KillYourTV.com - it's bad for you http://GWBushSucks.com - he's bad for everyone http://USoutofColombia.org - stupid wars are bad ........................................................ 'When I was coming up, it was a dangerous world, and you knew exactly who they were. It was us versus them, and it was clear who them was. Today, we are not so sure who the they are, but we know they're there.' - GW Bush # distributed via <nettime>: no commercial use without permission # <nettime> is a moderated mailing list for net criticism, # collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets # more info: majordomo@bbs.thing.net and "info nettime-l" in the msg body # archive: http://www.nettime.org contact: nettime@bbs.thing.net