Laila Mohammed on 26 Mar 2001 23:34:00 -0000 |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
<nettime> Cary Peppermint's "Curiously Strong" Americana |
Cary Peppermint's "Curiously Strong" Americana By Brian Lennon A question for for net.artists *maudit*: How much would you pay for something real? This question is posed by "An American Work of Art in Progress," which plays Zwischenology (Monique Roelofs) within the new+/-old commodity aesthetic of what one might, with a semicolon-wink to Teilhard, now term "noomedia." But then, holding that in your mind, think of the old: Gray's Elegy, Kis's Encyclopedia of the Dead, Benjamin's angel of skyward debris, Mike Davis's Llano del Rio---the ruins of L.A.'s alternative future: flush here with the literary capital that net.art.criticism buries its head for, I mean to point to the romantic function of alienated labor in dejecta: "Someone, somewhere made me; someone, somewhere, used me: I am still here"---spoken by a forlorn pop can, or Lispector's Macabea, from the pale of the gutter. The poetry in Marx's notion of commodity fetishism has to do with this sadness of trash, of unloved objects: update it to account for mechanical reproducibility, and you get the "plague of fantasies" according to Zizek: Che vuoi? hot off the press, receivable only in a state of distraction, more radically unloved for their "spectralization" of a real (really desired) object. Update to account for digitalization, and one speaks then of an englobement or enworldment of fantasy; what divides reproduction from simulacrum is a vanishing plane. Peppermint's invitation to a party "where you already happen to be" offers an event occurring in advance, a "born posthumously," post modo---the flung clothing, as it were, of an invisible sex machine. Am I hot, or what? Think of it as a "Happy Hour For Every Hour Between Right Now And The Unbelievable Yet Forthcoming Hour When All Happy Hours Are Over For Good and Discontinued Throughout The Entire World." You can *do* things with this artwork in progress. In the auction component, you buy useless items, images of useless items, or instructions on how to perform with useless items and then auction them off... In the gift shop, you placate the kids with a Hanes Beefy-T or a coffee mug or a mouse pad inscribed with the Restless Consumer Warning: artifacts triply bogus, twice ontically (as object and image) and then again "because" their art-energy autodestructs when purchased. Or so they say. In the photo album component, you look at pictures of a girl dancing in camouflage pants and someone's wrestling T-shirt. Who is she?? Who is the guy?? Behind a nimbus or aura, photo or muzzle flash of identicity, each iteration of her face is subject and other, empty set and dollar sign. How much would you pay for something real? Then there's the music store---well, not really; where you can taste "undiscovered" talent and hunger for more. Everything's up for sale, yes. But that's too easy. Each component fashions itself from the D.I.Y. machine of mid-tier services (Evite, Ebay, Mp3.com, Zing) offering prepackaged experiential formats for the vox populi to adopt at its leisure. "An American Work of Art in Progress" lives in that interior public sphere accessed via the dual mode of "home privacy" plus logged invasion and governed by the social contract including sincerity. But when the servant becomes the master, daring to wipe from its face the expression of indigence, "everything that it now does bears the mark of dissimulation" (Nietzsche). I want to avoid easy conclusions---for instance, that we perform "resistance" by violating such ad hoc and largely unsupervised conventions. First of all---who notices? The problematic of simulation is that, well, some can tell and some cain't. Yet Peppermint's Americana does not rest on the matter of "who gets it." It is curiously strong. At least one of the larger questions it asks is: Why are there always arriving new powers and knowledges (not least, new arts bureaucracies) to help us confuse "living" with "making a living"? Also: Whose are these nationalisms of art practice and art concept? Contra globalization (and Net hype), all this---America, art, questions---is limited by one's own location, one's own horizon, one's own capricious relating to a depoliticized "new media art" everywhere fed by the illusion of a free lance. One didn't fall to Earth, after all, only to lament. There's more to say... But back to the party. We have drained our penultimate glass of cash. If the "morning after" is ipso facto spectral (replicant memory), it is because we are still waiting for a---the!---love affair. We do not yet realize how it arrived. Where *was* that party, anyway? We're not simply "nowhere"---except in so far as "nowhere" means some place you might have been, on the best of days. This is the "future of art" conceived as an effort to see where "things are going" and what we creatures are going to do about it. But while the future is empty in art talk, it brims with quotidian Nextness in "real life." Which is finally what Peppermint's components reference---deictically, as Barthes said of chopsticks: indicating without ordering. Anarchic klik, break-it-down klik, becomes e-commerce, build-it-up klik. Is it a brave new world? We mean to speak here of genealogical, not revolutionary change, and of couvade, "sympathetic pregnancy," as the new future. Peppermint's American artwork is in the semidemilitarized zone, aspiring to fully coded commerce the way the Prairie Lights bookstore in Iowa City aspires to San Francisco's City Lights---that is to say, not really at all, although the signs converge: an instance of what Gayatri Spivak, in an altogether different context, has called "the spectralization of the rural." We are on the back end of The Sharper Imagism, of Hammacher Schlemmerung. Detournement is an older name for it. But we prefer to speak, with Zizek, of the art of pointless functionality, "the paradox of a purpose without purposiveness," hypertrophying the instrument so as to remind us---or to figure out in the first place---why we "do" anything at all. # distributed via <nettime>: no commercial use without permission # <nettime> is a moderated mailing list for net criticism, # collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets # more info: majordomo@bbs.thing.net and "info nettime-l" in the msg body # archive: http://www.nettime.org contact: nettime@bbs.thing.net