nettime's_mercurial_editor on Thu, 12 Jul 2001 04:57:10 +0200 (CEST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
<nettime> postmumford digest [armitage, hirsh] |
John Armitage <john.armitage@unn.ac.uk> Where have all the Luddites gone? jesse hirsh <jesse@tao.ca> Regarding Mumford - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - From: John Armitage <john.armitage@unn.ac.uk> Subject: Where have all the Luddites gone? Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2001 15:13:38 +0100 Hi folks Following on Sean's bibliography, how about two cheers at least for the Luddite tendency, somehow lost in the flood of the 1980s?: Frank Webster and Kevin Robins' (1986) Information Technology: A Luddite Analysis. Ablex, New York. Theodore Rozak's (1986) The Cult of Information: The Folklore of Computers and the True Art of Thinking. Cambridge. Lutterworth. David Noble's (1984) Forces of Production: A Social History of Industrial Automation. Three classics of Luddism in my book. Kirkpatrick Sale (1995) made an heroic effort to get the Luddite view heard above the clamour in the mid 90s with his Rebels Against the Future: The Luddites and their War on the Industrial revolution- Lessons for the Computer Age. Addison. Since then, not much, unless others know different? Best John ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ John Armitage Head of Multidisciplinary Studies School of Social, Political, Economic and Social Sciences University of Northumbria Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 8ST, UK. Tel: 0191 227 4971 Fax: 0191 227 4654 E-mail: (w) john.armitage@unn.ac.uk (h) j.armitage@technologica.demon.co.uk ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2001 11:03:16 -0400 (EDT) From: jesse hirsh <jesse@tao.ca> Subject: Regarding Mumford I wrote a reflection piece after I read Mumford's Myth of the Machine titled: "A Faith for the Possessive Individual" http://jesse.openflows.org/mumford.html Here's an excerpt: "So what is the Internet? A wicked pyramid scheme; the perpetual war economy; a get-rich-quick scam with free pornography; a fundamentalism for fundamentalists; a faith for the possessive individual. Like all tools that one would use, its shapes are that which make it, and how we make it shapes us. Which in this case is an issue of identity (communications) and possession (exchange). Created for war, and distributed by command, the Internet is the autonomous agent of Capital accumulation, with the primary commodity being intellectual property, in all its many forms." ... "Of course this is not to suggest that reality has become fragmented, rather it is society that is fragmenting, while reality remains unified in the metaphor of mind (resident in the cultural construction of the Internet). If we were to imagine this mind as manifest in the material world, it would be a `MegaShoppingMall'. It's primary function would be as a commercial space, designed to alienate, and constructed to contain consumers, while capturing their capital. The faithful in this world, are those who constantly accumulate anything they can, more often than not, for no reason whatsoever (Pokeman). The power in this system exists outside of it, parasitically removing the profit and value of the world. The only real interaction the inhabitants of this world have with those who control it, are via the security cameras in the ceiling, and the marketing data generated by their purchasing patterns. It is a self-contained, self-reflective, self-interpreting prison of habit and anxiety. Its primary means of control are in fact the conformity and totality of its commercialism. Anything can (and will) be bought and sold. Capitalism, as the system of economic control, fetishizes its own process of commodification, offering it (consumerism) as a religion unto itself, (foolishly) thinking that it can subject said religion to its (political) economic concerns and mechanisms of control. Culturally this religion is articulated as `Virtual Reality', which is another way of saying: unto each person shall be granted their own reality, if that is, the price is right, and their credit is good. The promise of this religion is that anything is possible, and that the boundaries of reality have been extended so far as to enable the instant actualization of that which we can imagine." 11:03am up 46 days, 17:01, 10 users, load average: 0.12, 0.11, 0.10 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - # distributed via <nettime>: no commercial use without permission # <nettime> is a moderated mailing list for net criticism, # collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets # more info: majordomo@bbs.thing.net and "info nettime-l" in the msg body # archive: http://www.nettime.org contact: nettime@bbs.thing.net