Amy Alexander on Wed, 26 Sep 2001 10:15:48 +0200 (CEST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
<nettime> if ($hacking =~ $terrorism) { |
sorry if this info has already been posted here; i may have missed it: http://www.securityfocus.com/news/257 on the one hand, i think most of us guessed right away that the recent terrorist activities would open the door for all sorts of oppressive agendas to get pushed through, so this is not surprising. on the other hand, if i set my time machine back a few years and tell my few-years-ago-self that legislation would be on the table to label e-graffiti (and even less destructive acts) terrorism punishable by life imprisonment without chance for parole, my few-years-ago-self would probably laugh at it as sci-fi paranoia. one person to whom i forwarded the article responded with "and no dressing up like indians and throwing cargo in the bay!" which seems to tie into the gist of other discussions here along the lines of "today's terrorists may be regarded tomorrow as freedom fighters." it holds very true here, as one can assume that, if it goes through - or even if it doesn't - it will be a handy tool against potential hactivism - at minimum for the "chilling effect." however, i'm looking on the bright side: as the dude responsible for the Blue Screen of Death, it should be pretty easy to get bill gates locked up for life. :-) (while i'm at it, i'd also like to suggest that hard drive manufacturers may be considering a an intellectual property suit against the Justice Department, for trademark tarnishment of "ATA.") ok, so maybe i'm not funny. fortunately john ashcroft is. from the article: "Testifying before the House Judiciary Committee, Ashcroft defended the proposal's definition of terrorism. 'I don't believe that our definition of terrorism is so broad,' said Ashcroft. 'It is broad enough to include things like assaults on computers, and assaults designed to change the purpose of government.'" hmm, does that last part include .... voting? -@ -- plagiarist.org Recontextualizing script-kiddyism as net-art for over 1/20 of a century. } # distributed via <nettime>: no commercial use without permission # <nettime> is a moderated mailing list for net criticism, # collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets # more info: majordomo@bbs.thing.net and "info nettime-l" in the msg body # archive: http://www.nettime.org contact: nettime@bbs.thing.net