Nils Röller on Tue, 9 Jul 2002 21:58:59 +0200 (CEST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
<nettime> Ahabs Governementality |
Ahabs Governmentality* Lets build a ship, not any ship but the Pequod. This ship drowned decades ago. It drowned at the end of Kaptain Ahabs hunt. Ahab tried to hunt down the Wite Whale, Moby Dick. We are rebuilding the destroyed vehicle, because we long for a constructive sensiblity. We are eager to keep in mind that revenge is tricky. The shipbuilding we intend to engage you will first of all change your state of mind. Be aware of this procedure (like Ahab was asked by Starbuck to be aware of himself). Three reasons are compelling us to think of Ahab. First Gerhard Conrads film on the german RAF-Member Holger Mainz. The film is titled Starbuck (like the first mate on deck of Ahabs ship), second, the analogy between Ahabs revenge voyage and the western research for islamic fundamentalist, third the structural analogy between Captain Ahab and Captain Picard (Commander of the enterprise E engaged in a fight against borgs). Last point first: Captain Picard has learned lessons from fiction. Fighting the Borg Captain Picard does not commit Ahabs error. Commander Picard does not constrain his crew to follow him into the death. No, gentleman Picard is going to be convincend by a woman of the 21th century, that it is better to rescue his crew and not to risk their lifes. Why then rebuild the Pequod? Instead of building the Enterprise and to look for a humanist captain Picard? A man who is governed by reflection and responsibilty for the others and not by revenge? First because we are convinced that learning from fiction is not so easy as displayed in the Enterprise life of the Movie First Contact. We do distrust Captain Picards insight. We do see him subjected to self governing principles. We would like to know more about the technologies of conciousness that are behind him. Because of lack of Ultra-light-speed devices and the technolgy of the Enterprise-era we prefer to step back to the 19th century. Rebuilding the Pequod and the technology that was at Ahabs disposal, we may gather information about technology and governing principles. This will lead to insights about the relation between art, technology and governementality. The "Eliot Effect" is an obstacle and a chance. It is a major mediatheoretical challenge. We have to reconsider the impact of the dichotomy between text based and oral argumentation. Please join us at the audio-video-livestream next Wednesday (July, 10) between 16h-18h (central european time) from ZKM’s Institute for Basic Research. The oral building session is currently held in German. (www.zkm.de) Or direct: http://basic-research.zkm.de:8080/basic_research/AG%20Philosophie%20und%20Naturwissenschaftenbasic research : current news) * Seminal inspiration stems from Nettelbecks reading of Moby Dick (www.tuxamoon.de), discussions with Joe Davis helped to find the way ()during a car drive between Jena and Cologne. Hans Diebner and Peter Weibel are giving the framework for further development (www.zkm.de). # distributed via <nettime>: no commercial use without permission # <nettime> is a moderated mailing list for net criticism, # collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets # more info: majordomo@bbs.thing.net and "info nettime-l" in the msg body # archive: http://www.nettime.org contact: nettime@bbs.thing.net