Brian Holmes on Sat, 31 May 2003 13:24:37 +0200 (CEST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
<nettime> Fascism in the USA? |
What does it mean for the average citizen to be a fascist? I do not have a certain answer to this question. Anyone with a more precise understanding should help here. It seems clear that, at least in the early phases, the average citizen carries out no directly repressive or murderous actions. Rather, it would seem that in a fascist society, s/he watches others do so without protesting, participates in collective national rituals without asking about the repressive and murderous actions being fulfilled by police or soldiers in the nation's name. At what point would one then have to conclude that the United States - and not just its current government - has become effectively fascist? The conditions may be gathering right now for that question to be answered. Three pieces of news have appeared at roughly the same time. They are: a. Rumsfeld's careless admission that Iraq may have destroyed its weapons of mass destruction before the war. Meaning that the war was unnecessary. b. Wolfowitz's even more shocking declaration, in a recent Vanity Fair interview (quoted today in Le Monde), that the issue of weapons of mass destruction was chosen "for bureaucratic reasons," i.e. as the only issue that could generate sufficient consensus in Washington to go ahead with the attack. c. The revelation, by the BBC's investigative reporters (relayed in The Nation), that the heroic media spectacle provided by US Army reporters of the rescue of Pvt. Jessica Lynch was entirely staged, having taken place in reality after the hospital in which she was being held had been abandoned by Iraqi forces. The first and and above all the second items strongly suggest that distorted intelligence was deliberately used to justify the war and thereby make it possible. The third item baldly shows the extent to which the US Army is ready to fabricate propaganda for domestic consumption, and the news networks such as Fox and CNN, to relay that propaganda. In Great Britain, a former member of Blair's cabinet, Robin Cook, who left the government in protest over the war, is now part of a move to demand investigation of similar falsifications, particularly the statement concerning Iraq's capacity to strike at Britain within "forty-five minutes," which was attributed to British intelligence services. If in the United States no serious and deep public questioning arises concerning the use of false intelligence and reporting to justify the declaration and pursuit of war, if such questioning is not accompanied by formal political and legal investigation, then I think we would have to face the disastrous reality that significant sectors of the world's wealthiest and most technologically advanced nation are willing to be lied to by their leaders. I'm not saying this is necessarily the case. I'm saying this looks like a real test. If a majority, or even a preponderant minority of American citizens are collectively willing to go through all the rituals of bellicosity and superpatriotism, but unwilling to demand investigation into the facts which are supposed to have made those rituals necessary, then one would have to very seriously ask the question whether a fascist society is not emerging in the USA. And given the interlinked nature of power in the world today, one would have to look around, not only in Britain but everywhere in the developed countries, and assess the level of functional agreement with this American fascism. Not to do so, and not to argue publically against these trends, would be to participate in their development. It would become extremely unwise, for instance, to wait for a more convincing test: Bush's reelection. My opinion is that if Bush is reelected, the US will have become, without any more doubt, a predominantly fascist society. While nervously awaiting that moment of truth, I'd appreciate it if people currently inside the US could give their observations on the way this first test unfolds. Brian Holmes # distributed via <nettime>: no commercial use without permission # <nettime> is a moderated mailing list for net criticism, # collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets # more info: majordomo@bbs.thing.net and "info nettime-l" in the msg body # archive: http://www.nettime.org contact: nettime@bbs.thing.net