Francis Hwang on Mon, 2 Jun 2003 10:16:12 +0200 (CEST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: <nettime> After nettime-bold, the Internet (Andrew Orlowski) |
Caveat lector: The Register is a decent pub, but everything written by Orlowski is only useful as virtual toilet paper. Since he started writing for them he's been focusing so specifically on attacking the blogging world that I have to wonder if there's some personal history there, or maybe just a sense of exclusion left over from a difficult childhood. All his stories seem to be in some way fixated on taking down the blogosphere, whether coining the term "googlewash" or painting the O'Reilly Emerging Technology Conference as some elitist cabal. (You can be sure that in the piece below, when he says "techno-utopians", he means "bloggers".) On top of that, a lot of his writing has this odd tone of unintentional paranoia that makes me wonder if he maintains an enemies list. The piece about the Internet dying isn't about what Lawrence Lessig thinks. It's about what Orlowski thinks, and his effort to use a bigger name to lend the air of authority to his ideas. Lessig himself pointed out the misquotation: http://cyberlaw.stanford.edu/lessig/blog/archives/2003_05.shtml#001190 Lessig's concern about the infrastructure is quite legitimate. (If you want to read it from the original source, go to http://cyberlaw.stanford.edu/lessig/blog/archives/ 2003_05.shtml#001180.) But the rest of Orlowski's complaints just seem like petty griping. Yeah, so too many web-sites have popup windows. Install a decent web browser -- they're free, you know. So some companies waste time on email. Pay some college student to implement Ultimate BBS for you, or maybe a wiki. It's like Orlowski's one of those grumpy old men who complains about how they don't make 'em like they used to. Except for the fact that a few decades ago, they didn't make 'em at all. So what's he complaining about, exactly? Francis On Sunday, June 1, 2003, at 10:29 PM, geert lovink wrote: > It is not only nettime-bold that died, it is the Internet as a whole, <...> # distributed via <nettime>: no commercial use without permission # <nettime> is a moderated mailing list for net criticism, # collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets # more info: majordomo@bbs.thing.net and "info nettime-l" in the msg body # archive: http://www.nettime.org contact: nettime@bbs.thing.net