Aliette Guibert on Wed, 14 Apr 2004 20:19:26 +0200 (CEST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: <nettime> genetic colonialism is cutting edge... |
Hi! Ryan! Yes, thank you for the title: " genetic colonialism is cutting edge ", I indeed approve you, and on the other hand here are some marks on the ressourcement of the theories racist as transracistes... As Gobineau has worked with Alexis de Tocqueville and was his principal secretary during his chancellery in charge of the foreign office under Napoleon III, in France, doubtless as it known in the United States of his work " Attempt on the disparity of the human races " (published 1855), where he notably defines the superiority of a " Germanic race "... I always feel a distrust in front of the scientific theories which allow social vertues to the theory of the genes... Spend over the theories in human sciences easy to demystify, but that to say scientific theories which pursue to speak in the name of the immanent and definitive truth? And it seems to me so problematic involving of defining pure races that involving of innovating a theory of the interbreeding or the hybridization all the more it seems almost impossible to base a scientific theory of the hybridization from the biologic hypothesis in anthropology without defining first criteria attached to supposed pure models to have prééxisté in the interbreeding... The racist theories would have almost disappeared after the war, because of the Nazi horrors, it remains that if the genetics of the populations of former days has been darkened by the molecular genetics like today's dominant model, indeed it could arrive in the prediction of the currrent dominion of the theory of the genes that the same molecular genetics begins to produce information able of resuscitating a new genetics of the populations. It would be a question no more ethnic qualification according to physical evaluation of the persons, but the genetic qualification according to molecular evaluation of genomes. Upstream, it is always the question supposed by the unitarian origin of the man, the same as his genetic code just like a paradigm of divine, in what consists exactly the fund of the reductionnist theory to Biology... And science in a configuration of universal truth (that designs Power - and the territory of irreversible action for Humanity). Even if the genetic code appears to be a model which works well in Research performances to the techno-scientific production, what on the competence that could not be estimated (or only in a critical dualistic ou dialectic strategy on paradigm, and secondly in the view of the unpredictable part of the long time learning of critical mass and entropy), even it would run like an excellent machine of production ? The same reagard can be applied to Evolution and mutations, in a post-darwinian view The theory of Darwin integrating a theory of the environment not only material (from the scale molecular till the big natural or technical fractures) but cultural (the transmission of the culture by the social and domestic environment and the slowness of the education from the birth till adult, whose brain in health never stops being reborn and estimating what it underestimates towards what it recognizes, and knowing that neurones reborning until the last day of the life: obviously the question then would rather be moved towards the activity of streams, and the environment)... And Slowness of the education introducing a reversive effect of the evolution into a respective story of the human evolution playing in a chaotic or critical game in global evolution (the entrance in the universe by the technical subtlety, and post-technical issue, which means the appropriate part of the man in the environment translations). It is there at the same time a summary and interpretation: an hypothesis not the truth. If the reductionnist plan of the genetic code speaks in the name of truth, and more truth concept being already widely extended beyond by the entropy of what it generated, it must not interest us more than the definition resulting from observing diachronistic events of different men in several places, in the capacity of different genetic occurences, or the same in one African genetic prime opportunity... All reductionist hypothesis agreeing control to Power, even military and police Power and which cost only to lead astray the research budgets? While Creole theory runs living. A. From: "ryan griffis" <grifray@yahoo.com> To: "nettime" <nettime-l@bbs.thing.net> Sent: Monday, April 12, 2004 9:39 PM Subject: <nettime> genetic colonialism is cutting edge... > > "She's really cutting-edge," said George Washington University > anthropologist Alison Brooks, who has spent more than three decades > studying African prehistory. "There are all these people collecting > genes in Finland and India, but no one was really working in Africa. We > know very, very little about the African gene pool." > Tishkoff is convinced African genes hold the key: "If I want to know > deep human origins, I only need to look in Africa." > http://www.baltimoresun.com/news/nationworld/bal- > te.ms.dna12apr12,0,149678.story?coll=bal-news-nation > > # distributed via <nettime>: no commercial use without permission > # <nettime> is a moderated mailing list for net criticism, > # collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets > # more info: majordomo@bbs.thing.net and "info nettime-l" in the msg body > # archive: http://www.nettime.org contact: nettime@bbs.thing.net > # distributed via <nettime>: no commercial use without permission # <nettime> is a moderated mailing list for net criticism, # collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets # more info: majordomo@bbs.thing.net and "info nettime-l" in the msg body # archive: http://www.nettime.org contact: nettime@bbs.thing.net