olia lialina on Fri, 14 Mar 2008 16:50:29 +0100 (CET) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
<nettime> An Infinite Seance 2 |
An Infinite Séance 2 As the New Media arts evolved, we have seen many different ideas dominating the scene at different times: it used to be interactivity, randomness, networking, virtuality, and so on. The attention of artists working with the New Media has been focused primarily on studying the new possibilities offered by computers, algorithms and networks, and on the effect they had on everyday life and art, on the relationship between a viewer, an artist and a piece of art itself. The meaning of most artworks -- some of them great, and some rather mediocre, -- revolved around the new art forms and the new technologies that inspired them. Making sense of new technologies became a driving force behind artistic practices. Some artists were charmed by it and others seemed disappointed. Both sides, however, felt that this situation could not last long. By the beginning of the new millennium, computer technologies were changing at such a pace that no artist nursing media-specific aspirations could remain consistently up-to-date. As a result, we were left with underdeveloped fields, New Media languages that were never fully learned, and immature aesthetics, all of which have become the characteristic features of New Media. Every season, yet another area of practice was declared dead and buried, and replaced with a new hero of the hour (a new medium, not a new artist), instilling panic and fear of imminent doom. However, in the last two years the situation has gradually calmed down. Artists stopped being jittery and collectors became more active. Exhibitions have shaped up and became more eye-pleasing. New media has switched to pictures, to moving and dynamic images. Besides the obvious market interest in eye candy, there are three more reasons that encouraged this switch. Processing gave birth to a new line of graphic generators and inspired a new wave of interest in generative forms. YouTube invaded the Web and turned video into a standard way of expressing thoughts and feelings. And last but not least, video projectors have become substantially cheaper, while the quality of the image has grown significantly better. Moreover, we now have computers that are completely flat, and it seems like white walls are now forever married to digital culture (which is the new politically correct term for new media). It's all about video and projection today. It looks neat, and yet there's something missing -- we miss the special relationship that used to exist between an artist and a chosen medium. Now, let's talk about projects that can satisfy that thirst for media-specific art and still fit perfectly into the current trends: Gebhard Sengmüller Slide Movie - Diafilmprojektor John Michael Boling 20 years ago Dennis Knopf Bootyclipse Сory Archangel Two Keystoned Projectors (one upside down) full text at http://art.teleportacia.org/observation/infinite_seance_2/ yours olia # distributed via <nettime>: no commercial use without permission # <nettime> is a moderated mailing list for net criticism, # collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets # more info: http://mail.kein.org/mailman/listinfo/nettime-l # archive: http://www.nettime.org contact: nettime@kein.org