Michael Wojcik on Tue, 15 Jul 2008 20:25:46 +0200 (CEST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: <nettime> Dreaming of Molly Millions, the Panther Moderns and Body Hacking |
lotu5 wrote: > Looking back at William Gibson's Neuromancer, I wonder, why has so much > geek energy and time gone into creating one aspect of his vision in the > book, cyberspace, and not others, like body hacking? Yes, I know that > Vernor Vinge came up with the concept of Cyberspace before Gibson, but > Gibson's book is the one most often cited as the huge cultural influence > at the root of contemporary cyberculture. I think that's a convenient fiction. I don't believe Gibson's work was really very influential in the development of "cyberculture" (an odious neologism, IMO, with no meaningful relationship to Wiener's cybernetics). It's a handy pop-culture referent, because of its faddish popularity, but I don't see any evidence that much serious work used it as a blueprint or even a vision. For example, many professional software developers - I suspect most - find Gibson's vision of VR hacking / programming impractical and undesirable. If memory serves, Stephenson has a short bit on this in _Snow Crash_. Stephenson, unlike Gibson, is an engineer, and understands why Gibson's fantasy doesn't play well in the real world. Consequently, VR remains a niche field, and even shared interactive multimedia environments are mostly used for playing games. Despite the hype and corporate endorsements, Second Life is still a second-string player in Internet culture, with somewhere around a quarter-million regular users.[1] eBay has around 84 million.[2] Body modification, on the other hand, is a robust industry with a steadily-growing public profile. How many tattoo reality shows are on TV these days? While crazy elective plastic surgery may still be a small counterculture, I think its chances look at least as good as those of wacky VR cyberspace. So I don't think the question is "why has Gibsonian cyberculture caught on, while Gibsonian body modification hasn't" - I think it's "why hasn't the Gibsonian vision caught on in general". And I think the answer is that it's more interesting as fantasy than as reality. People prefer to do other things with their resources. [1] http://many.corante.com/archives/2007/01/04/real_second_life_numbers_thanks_to_david_kirkpatrick.php [2] http://www.alleyinsider.com/2008/4/ebay_ebay_q1_earnings_live_analysis -- Michael Wojcik Micro Focus Rhetoric & Writing, Michigan State University # distributed via <nettime>: no commercial use without permission # <nettime> is a moderated mailing list for net criticism, # collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets # more info: http://mail.kein.org/mailman/listinfo/nettime-l # archive: http://www.nettime.org contact: nettime@kein.org