Nicholas Knouf on Fri, 13 May 2011 11:35:36 +0200 (CEST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
<nettime> ISEA 2011 fees |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 (Apologies if you have seen this already, but I think it's appropriate for nettime as well.) Hello nettime, I presume that there are many nettimers who are planning on attending ISEA 2011 in Istanbul this year. If you have not looked at the registration fees for the conference, prepare yourself for some sticker shock. The fees seem to be disproportionately expensive for a conference hosted at a university. Student fees begin at EUR250, with non-student fees beginning at EUR300---and both jump to EUR400 if you don't register by Sunday. In comparison, fees for last year's ISEA were EUR100 to EUR150 for non-VIP passes, and fees for ISEA 2008 ranged from 100 to 450 Singapore dollars (translating to, if I remember the conversion rate correctly at the time, around US$70 to US$320), with the highest-priced pass for presenters rounding out at around US$250. As a graduate student I am most concerned about what appears to me massive gouging of an already cash-strapped population. I do not understand how an event for digital arts hosted at a university can have registration fees that approach those of academic-corporate conferences such as CHI. At least for CHI the cost is understandable, if problematic, because of existing agreements organizations such as ACM have with major hotel chains. In this case, I cannot see where a fee of US$570 (if you don't make the Sunday deadline) is appropriate for graduate students---or anyone for that matter. This pertains to our shared concerns, namely more open access to digital technologies and their use in new forms of expression. How can fees of this sort enable any sort of open dialogue with people who are not already attached to well-funded institutions? And even within the US, as well as elsewhere, funding for the type of work we do has been massively scaled-back in the recent years, making fees like this prohibitively expensive even for those of us in the Global North. I have my own thoughts as to why this has taken place this year, namely ISEAs choice to be associated with the global art market via the Istanbul Biennial. However that is only a supposition and I would encourage anyone on the list affiliated with the ISEA organization to chime in with explanations for the high fees. I'm also waiting on information from the tourist company that ISEA has contracted with. I think it's only fair that we receive a complete breakdown of where our conference fees are going when we are personally forking over so much of our limited amount of money. These fees make me seriously reconsider my participation in ISEA 2011. I wonder if our money is not better spent organizing a counter-conference that does not discriminate based on ability to pay. Perhaps we would then be able to have a real "international symposium on electronic art". I encourage others to chime in publicly. Best, nick knouf -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Topal (http://freshmeat.net/projects/topal) iEYEARECAAYFAk3MuR4ACgkQoHDFiKQ8nMlA1wCeMFgYef2TtiUhZz8QGDrtZxiA 7zUAoIRPdnw4aRXFKV8qQE3rsOnjhD47 =q+kn -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- # distributed via <nettime>: no commercial use without permission # <nettime> is a moderated mailing list for net criticism, # collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets # more info: http://mx.kein.org/mailman/listinfo/nettime-l # archive: http://www.nettime.org contact: nettime@kein.org