Alan Sondheim on Fri, 21 Jun 2013 10:03:50 +0200 (CEST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
<nettime> Do we still engage? |
Do we still engage? Do we still engage with Sartre? Do we still read Derrida? Do they speak to us? Does Heidegger speak to us? Does Husserl? Is Hegel still critical to our thinking? Does anyone read Sartre? Does anyone think through Derrida? Do we think we've absorbed Badiou? Is Badiou important? Is Shestov? Is philosophy dead or dying? Is thinking philosophically still important? Does anyone read Plotinus? Does St Augustine speak to us? Is Descartes necessary? Have we absorbed Spinoza? Are we the better for Kristeva? Is Butler still relevant? Is Russell? Have we absorbed Wittgenstein? Do we still engage with Reichenbach? Is Latour still important? Have we gone beyond Carnap? Is Peirce relevant? Does anyone read James? Have we buried Marx? Does anyone think through Freud? Is Arendt still necessary? Are we still inspired by Jung? Do we relate to Plato? Is our world Aristotelian? Is Nietzsche still necessary? Has philosophy disappeared? Have people read Thom? Has Mill disappeared? Is Confucius fundamental? Do we still grapple with Hobbes? Is Kant still an inspiration? Are there answers to questions? Do we still learn from Kierkegaard? Is Lacan still read? Does Maimonides speak to us? Have we abandoned Fanon? Does anyone think through Kofman? Is there any reason to consider Hui Shi? Has Zhuangzi turned the world upside down? Does Parmenides offer solace? Does anyone read Goodman any more? Do we still engage with Bachelard? Is Balibar important? Is philosophy important? Do we consider West? Is Ranciere dead? Does Althusser still speak to us? Is the thought of Merleau-Ponty important to anyone? Is there anything to learn anymore from philosophy? Do we still read Trotsky? Is Grene still relevant? Have we absorbed Cassirer? Is philosophy of science science? Is philosophy of science necessary? Do we still read Langer? Is thought important? Is untethered thought necessary? Is philosophy tethered? Are we engaged with de Beauvoir? Do we remember Deleuze? Do we consider Guattari? Do Deleuze and Guattari offer solace? Is there any value in reading Lyotard? Have we forgotten Kripke? Have we ever comprehended Baudrillard? Is there any point to philosophy? Does philosophy worsen us? Is it necessary to think philosophically? Is it relevant to abandon philosophy? Have we taken Lao Tzu to heart? Are we trusting Agamben? Have we forgotten Schopenhauer? Do we still read Schelling critically? Is Heraclitus still inspiring? Can our lives be guided by Pascal? Are we informed by Whitehead? Do we comprehend the depth of any thought? Do we take thought to heart? Do we still engage with Lucretius? Do we still read Irigaray? How do we know? # distributed via <nettime>: no commercial use without permission # <nettime> is a moderated mailing list for net criticism, # collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets # more info: http://mx.kein.org/mailman/listinfo/nettime-l # archive: http://www.nettime.org contact: nettime@kein.org