nettime's_zentral_kommittee on Wed, 7 Aug 2013 20:34:22 +0200 (CEST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
<nettime> Danny O'Brien: On the Thoughts of Chairman Bruce |
< http://www.oblomovka.com/wp/2013/08/06/1515/ > On the Thoughts of Chairman Bruce So I'm reading [27]the latest missive from Chairman Bruce Sterling about Snowden and Assange, and even though I have some history with the guy, I'm clapping along, because he always writes a fine barnstormer. Then, [28]like Cory, I get pulled up by this bit. He's reeling off a list of names, from [29]7iber to [30]Bytes For All. I recognise them. They're a list of activist groups I work with. The names are from [31]a project I'm working on. This what he says about those groups, in passing: Just look at them all, and that's just the A's and B's... Obviously, a planetary host of actively concerned and politically connected people. Among this buzzing horde of eager online activists from a swarm of nations, what did any of them actually do for Snowden? Nothing. Before Snowden showed up from a red-eye flight from Hawaii, did they have the least idea what was actually going on with the hardware of their beloved Internet? Not a clue. They've been living in a pitiful dream world where their imaginary rule of law applies to an electronic frontier--a frontier being, by definition, a place that never had any laws. Well, let's go through the Chairman's list alphabetically, and see if they have any excuse for their lack of aid and woeful ignorance about the electronic frontier. First on the list, [32]7iber works in Amman, Jordan. 7iber is so politically-connected that their own government [33]banned them last month from Jordan's domestic Internet. I'm not sure reaching out to them was ever going to nab Snowden a safe harbor in the Middle-East. Probably the opposite: after all, they were were one of the [34]groups translating Wikileaks into Arabic back in 2010, which didn't exactly endear them to the local states. Next up, [35]Access. Access has a base in the United States, where aiding Snowden would get you hauled in for questioning on [36]an espionage charge. I note they've been in such "a pitiful dream world" about the rule of law they spent a sizeable chunk of the last few years campaigning (with EFF and CPJ and many others) to [37]get https turned on for a huge chunk of the Internet, thereby protecting it -- I'm sure entirely accidentally -- from unlawful NSA taps. You know, the ones that EFF has been telling people about [38]since 2006. Similarly,[39] Agentura.ru must be incredibly ignorant about the surveillance state, given that it's been investigating and whistleblowing on the Russian and American security service [40]for 13 years. Enough to be detained and questioned several times by Russia's secret police. But hey, that's just words on the Internet, right? What we really need is less of that online guff, and more direction action, right? Like our next witness, [41]Aktion Freiheit statt Angst, who have been protesting surveillance in Germany since 2006, when they inspired 15,000 people onto the streets of Berlin. Maybe you can explain to them how they can better make the security state a bigger issue in Germany this year on [42]September 7th, at Potsdamerplatz. I can't imagine any of those people will be agitating for better treatment for Bradley Manning or Snowden this year. Moving on: here's a pic from those NGO types at the [43]Bahrain Center for Human Rights. That's the back of [44]Nabeel Rajab. He sort of knows a little about the surveillance state, because his electronic communications and phones were monitored after receiving this beating from the Bahraini government.He's been imprisoned in part for his work on social networks. Besides the imprisonment of Rajab, the Bahrain Center for Human Rights in general also has some idea about the risks of Internet surveillance, because elevenother twitter users in that country have been jailed because of anonymous tweets that were tracked by sending them malicious web addresses. [45]Here's their detailed report. Note that that particular report ends with an explanation of how you can defeat that kind of surveillance. You know, apart from that delusional rule of law. Wrapping up those As and Bs, [46]Bolo Bhi and [47]Bytes for All are both conducting the most sustained and brilliant work I've seen in advocacy, fighting against surveillance and censorship in one of the countries most determinedly targeted by both its own government and the United States for anti-terrorist action: Pakistan. The idea that these groups, who are fighting to keep the Internet defended in their own country, are supposed to drop their grassroots activism and start, I don't know, hob-nobbing the people they are actively opposing in their own states to get Snowden a break, or have any illusions about the rule of law on the Internet right now, betrays a profound misunderstand about what digital activists actually do these days. Online activists these days do policy work, but they do a lot more than that. They have to do a lot more than that, because these days what we do in the "electronic civ lib" world is actually defend real people targetted by this surveillance. It's been like that since around about 2008, when all of this deeply stopped being theoretical. Because it's around that time that we all started getting friends and colleagues on government watchlists, or getting thrown in jail as a result of surveillance or Internet activity. And it's weird that Bruce doesn't know that things got this weird five years ago, because ten years ago, he predicted at least part of it. Here's how another of [48]his barnstormers, this time in 2002, to the O'Reilly Open Source Convention. In times of adversity, you learn who your friends are. You guys need a lot of friends. You need friends in all walks of life. Pretty soon, you are going to graduate from the status of techie geeks to official dissidents. This is your fate. People are wasting time on dissident relics like Noam Chomsky. Professor Chomsky is a pretty good dissident: he's persistent, he means what he says, and he's certainly very courageous, but this is the 21st century, and Stallman is a bigger deal. Lawrence Lessig is a bigger deal. Y'know, Lawrence, he likes to talk as if all is lost. He thinks we ought to rise up against Disney like the Serbians attacking Milosevic. He expects the population to take to the streets. Fuck the streets. Take to the routers. Take to the warchalk. Lawrence needs to talk to real dissidents more. He needs to talk to some East European people. When a crackdown comes, that isn't the end of the story. That's the start of a dissident's story. And this isn't about fat-cat crooks in our Congress who are on the take from the Mouse. This is about global civil society. It's Globalution. Okay, that's a bit over the top, even for a 2002 O'Reilly audience. But hey, a classic Sterling coinage! It's "globalution"! In the end, it wasn't Lessig who got cracked down on by the US government. Ridiculous idea! No, it was his colleague, Aaron. Here [49]they are at the time. They were both at [50]that conference. Aaron left early, and so I think he missed that speech. He [51]blogged about it though. Bruce continues: I like to think I'm one of your friends. That's easy enough to say. But one of the true delights of the world of free software is that it's about deeds, not words. It's about words that become deeds when they're in the box. So, I remember when the Bradley Manning story broke. Here's [52]Bruce's words (and deeds) at the time, when the techie geek finally and horribly graduated to official dissident: Bradley Manning, was a bored, resentful, lower-echelon guy in a dead end, who discovered some awesome capacities in his system that his bosses never knew it had... [People just like Manning] are banal. Bradley Manning is a young, mildly brainy, unworldly American guy who probably would have been pretty much okay if he'd been left alone to skateboard, read comic books and listen to techno music. __________________________________________________________________ In 1998, I was one of a handful of fresh-faced newly-minted cypherpunk activists in the UK, trying ineptly to stop the roller-coaster of the UK's Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act (and in particular the bit that would outlaw strong encryption in the UK) from being passed. Doing this kind of tech activism outside the United States was, and frankly still is, a little frustrating. Whenever there was any story about our corner of the political universe -- digital wiretaps, online censorship, public key cryptography -- it always seemed to be about what was happening in the US, and not the rest of the world. Back then, I felt we needed the US media and policy space to pay attention to our fight: because we felt, very strongly, it was a global fight. One day, we saw that Bruce Sterling was [53]coming into town for a book reading, and we thought: here's our chance. Like good Nineties digital activists, we'd all read our Hacker Crackdown, and knew he might be a friend in getting some rip-roaring coverage in the heart of the beast. After horribly hijacking him from what looked a nice literary meal, we took him to heroin-chic dive bar in Soho, told him our problems, and begged him to help. Forget defending crypto, he said. It's doomed. You're screwed. No, the really interesting stuff, he said, is in postmodern literary theory. Honest to God and ask my friends, it broke my poor dork heart. I listened to him talk for a few hours about what was research for [54]"Zeitgeist", and then we went home and fought off the outlawing of crypto without him, but with a tiny bunch of committed Brits, some of whom [55]are still working on that [56]fight [57]today. Fifteen years on, the world sucks, but some parts are a bit better. As Bruce points out with his As and Bs, I live as part of a far greater and interlinked world of what he called "global civic society", who, behind the scenes or in front of the microphones, actually do work together to defend people like Snowden, build tools for decentralisation and privacy, and frantically try and work out how to make them work for everyone. Some of us work on policy, some of us work in a [58]myriad other ways to change the world, including whistleblowing. We try to minimize the number who get beaten up or killed. I don't think any of us live in much of a dream world any more. Pretty much all of us are more cynical than you'd believe after seeing what's gone down. And I know, given the odds, some of it looks pathetic sometimes, but believe me, we can the hardest critics on each other about that. They'd laugh me out of town if I ever said "globulution", for instance. And, as the good Chairman says, you do learn who your friends are. <...> References <...> 27. https://medium.com/geek-empire-1/a1ebd2b4a0e5 28. http://boingboing.net/2013/08/05/how-sterlings-the-ecuadori.html 29. http://www.7iber.com/ 30. http://content.bytesforall.pk/ 31. https://www.necessaryandproportionate.org/ 32. http://www.7iber.com/ 33. https://now.mmedia.me/lb/en/10questions/jordan-blocks-7ibercom 34. http://www.middle-east-online.com/english/?id=43166 35. https://www.accessnow.org/ 36. http://usnews.nbcnews.com/_news/2013/06/21/19079389-us-charges-nsa-leaker-snowden-with-espionage?lite 37. https://www.accessnow.org/page/s/protectourprivacy 38. https://www.eff.org/nsa-spying/timeline 39. http://agentura.ru/english/ 40. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Agentura.Ru 41. http://www.aktion-freiheitstattangst.org/ 42. http://www.aktion-freiheitstattangst.org/en/articles/3775-20130907-freiheit-statt-angst-demo-in-berlin.htm 43. http://www.bahrainrights.org/ 44. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nabeel_Rajab 45. http://www.bahrainrights.org/en/node/6275 46. http://bolobhi.org/ 47. http://content.bytesforall.pk/ 48. http://www.oreillynet.com/network/2002/08/05/sterling.html 49. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Lawrence_Lessig_and_Aaron_Swartz.jpg 50. http://www.aaronsw.com/weblog/000434 51. http://www.aaronsw.com/weblog/000466 52. http://www.webstock.org.nz/the-blast-shack/ 53. http://www.ntk.net/index.cgi?b=01998-02-20&l=114#l 54. http://www.amazon.com/Zeitgeist-Bruce-Sterling/dp/0553576410 55. http://blogs.lse.ac.uk/mediapolicyproject/2013/07/04/caspar-bowden-tracing-the-missteps-to-the-prism-revelation/ 56. http://www.privacysurgeon.org/blog/ 57. https://www.privacyinternational.org/ 58. https://noisysquare.com/ethics-and-power-in-the-long-war-eleanor-saitta-dymaxion/ <...> # distributed via <nettime>: no commercial use without permission # <nettime> is a moderated mailing list for net criticism, # collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets # more info: http://mx.kein.org/mailman/listinfo/nettime-l # archive: http://www.nettime.org contact: nettime@kein.org