Aymeric Mansoux on Thu, 19 Jun 2014 14:22:00 +0200 (CEST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: <nettime> a free letter to cultural digest [2x] |
Rob Myers said : > [...] > > I do share your wistfulness regarding the state of Free Culture. But > I'm unwilling to turn the lights off just yet. The point that I'm trying to make is that free culture has succeeded already in the way it has reached critical mass. However the consequence of the tipping point has been miscalculated as it did not lead to a revolutionary cultural phenomenon, but instead created a rich nested territory of free culture practices within the overwhelming non-free cultural domain. The former could even be extended to what Mike Linksvayer coined semi-free culture to encompass the different ND and NC style licenses and I'd be happy to throw in as well the so-called copyfree licenses in what would be a mix of things that, in a way or another, try to address issues of freedom in relationship to different forms of production and distribution. Regardless, we have at this point a rather amazing collection of things being produced in this territory and even if it could be criticized as too much self-referential or inbred, there has been already been enough iterations and mutations to bring enough cultural diversity so that one can happily decide to join it and develop their own practice without the feeling it's mere template copypasta. However, looking closer at it, this territory is nothing but an emulation running on a host that can still threaten its execution or make it very hard to sustain itself. More importantly, I foresee a scenario, and here I'll stand on my doomsday soap box, where the cooperation mechanism in free culture will simply collapse because it failed to recognise the ideological conflicts that constitute it, and instead kept cheering the bigger picture of innovation and disruptive economics while only superficially looking at the ethics, conditions and motivations of participation in such a system. Right now these tensions and conflicts are the engine of free culture as it allows different systems of beliefs to interface with each others and gives infinite room for others to bootstrap their own (as long as one compromises on some shared contractual elements). But as seen with the increasing fractal proliferation of licenses, the increase of cynical Left-Right blaming games when it comes to understanding the nature of free culture, the growing disinterest of younger generations to even bother licensing their work (as best seen in Github repos), and the after party effect where one realises that everyone else had a different dress code, I don't think this is leading to anything good or sustainable for the whole free culture environment, whether it's defined, semi-free or unspoken. So, while everyone is still around, and the light is still on, we should take advantage of this and think together about what should be the next step to take. a. -- http://log.bleu255.com # distributed via <nettime>: no commercial use without permission # <nettime> is a moderated mailing list for net criticism, # collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets # more info: http://mx.kein.org/mailman/listinfo/nettime-l # archive: http://www.nettime.org contact: nettime@kein.org