Jaromil on Fri, 17 Jun 2016 20:06:36 +0200 (CEST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
<nettime> Bankers on ecstasy (but is the party over?) |
dear nettimers, following up the crypto-money craze on "Blockchains", the diva setup of Ethereum we-will-run-the-computer-of-the-world (and you will all be assimilated or obsoleted) left a big crater this morning (CET time) http://uk.businessinsider.com/dao-hacked-ethereum-crashing-in-value-tens-of-millions-allegedly-stolen-2016-6 (US is just waking up to it, many more articles will likely come) An exploited bug in DAO contracts (the trans-humanist dream who wanted to run automatic contracts because humans are too stupid and too slow) burned more than 60 milion worth of dollars as ETH started flowing into a mysterious account. Those whom I have spoken to about the issue may remember: I've always discouraged from stepping on ETH grounds, not just because of all the fanfare and the me-me-me shilling grounds, but because there is little reasoning on *computational language* in its implementation. A few other people share this opinion, the very well respectable Bitcoin developer Greg Maxwell for instance points out here https://www.reddit.com/r/btc/comments/4oij7v/oleg_andreev_on_twitter_vitalik_tries_to_switch/d4cvjo1 that "It's the recursive call issue, -- ultimately it's a design flaw in the EVM that makes it very hard to write safe code. Even many of their examples were vulnerable to it and similar forms." as well bright researchers like Meredith point out in a twit now https://twitter.com/maradydd/status/743770126156128256 "Told you gas wasn't sufficient to keep Ethereum secure. Turns out, program semantics matter!" and more bits worth reading here https://medium.com/@beautyon_/the-fundamental-problems-with-ethereum-408c420849f0#.vjttpujex Also for the literates, here you'll find a pretty good analysis of the flaws http://hackingdistributed.com/2016/06/16/scanning-live-ethereum-contracts-for-bugs/ Now I really hope you don't mind me cashing on some "I told'ya"s. It is anyway not why I'm writing. I'm writing to try answer another question, curious of your opinion: how the hell 60 and more millions (still counting) were stuffed into this toy?! now put your seatbelt on and be ready to know that *banksters are on ecstasy*. So much of the bailed out financial sector has been busy on it and investing it. 3days ago the news recited: "R3 Issues Buterin's "Ethereum Platform Review" Papers--Opportunities and Challenges for Private and Consortium Blockchains" https://bitcoinmagazine.com/articles/r-issues-buterin-s-ethereum-platform-review-papers-opportunities-and-challenges-for-private-and-consortium-blockchains-1465943849 Ethereum was in fact funded with early chip-ins from Goldman Sachs and grew later as the rather sloppy brainchild of a growing consortium of Banks which evidently needed some excuse to dump the bailouts of tax payers into some sort of "tech innovation" gig. Yet another one? here: "ING Bank Participates in R3's Comparative Test of Distributed Ledgers and Cloud Platforms" https://bitcoinmagazine.com/articles/ing-bank-participates-in-r-s-comparative-test-of-distributed-ledgers-and-cloud-platforms-1457543723 Oh BTW Peter Thiel is also involved. Just sayin' So what is this R3 about really? R3 and consortium member banks Barclays, BMO Financial Group, Credit Suisse, Commonwealth Bank of Australia, HSBC, Natixis, Royal Bank of Scotland, TD Bank, UBS, UniCredit and Wells Fargo each connected on an R3-managed private peer-to-peer distributed ledger, underpinned by Ethereum technology and hosted on a virtual private network in Microsoft Azure, the public cloud platform offering Blockchain as a Service (BaaS) in an accelerated development environment. http://r3cev.com/press/2016/1/20/r3-brings-eleven-major-global-financial-institutions-together-on-a-cloud-based-distributed-ledger And here for a full list: The banks involved in the project include Banco Santander, Bank of America, Barclays, BBVA, BMO Financial Group, BNP Paribas, BNY Mellon, CIBC, Commonwealth Bank of Australia, Citi, Commerzbank, Credit Suisse, Danske Bank, Deutsche Bank, J.P. Morgan, Goldman Sachs, HSBC, ING Bank, Intesa Sanpaolo, Macquarie Bank, Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, Mizuho Financial Group, Morgan Stanley, National Australia Bank, Natixis, Nomura, Nordea, Northern Trust, OP Financial Group, Scotiabank, State Street, Sumitomo Mitsui Banking Corporation, Royal Bank of Canada, Royal Bank of Scotland, SEB, Societe Generale, Toronto-Dominion Bank, UBS, UniCredit, U.S. Bancorp, Wells Fargo and Westpac Banking Corporation. So. well. good luck with the too big to fail! seems like they are burning their last neurons in crypto-ecstasy, why should you trust them then? We need re-hab, not bailouts! ciao -- ~.,_ Denis Roio aka Jaromil http://Dyne.org think &do tank "+. CTO and co-founder free/open source developers @) ⚷ crypto κρυπτο крипто गुप्त् 加密 האנוסים المشفره @@) GnuPG: 6113D89C A825C5CE DD02C872 73B35DA5 4ACB7D10 (@@@) opmsg:73a8e097a038d82b 8afb4c05804bda0d 281b3880fbc19b88 # distributed via <nettime>: no commercial use without permission # <nettime> is a moderated mailing list for net criticism, # collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets # more info: http://mx.kein.org/mailman/listinfo/nettime-l # archive: http://www.nettime.org contact: nettime@kein.org # @nettime_bot tweets mail w/ sender unless #ANON is in Subject: