nettime on Wed, 10 Aug 2016 19:07:44 +0200 (CEST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
<nettime> Three Electromagnetic Field Lines |
Three Electromagnetic Field Lines ================================= The EMF Camp [1], on the country estate of Loseley [2] in the deep south of England, was good fun. Some 1700 people descended for the weekend on the field below the big house and camped amongst fire belching art installations, video game consoles from the 1980s, black- and silver-smithing, soldering and blind navigation workshops, and marquee tents with interesting talks of which I sadly managed to see too few. There was, however, something missing. Something difficult to articulate clearly, and in large part cultural -- though only in a very minor way related to national culture of the UK as compared to other places. It has more to do with the gulf between the hacker and media activist collectives of ten or twenty years ago and the makerspaces of today. The Ethernet ------------ There was ethernet and power available to most every tent, and an overloaded wireless network somewhat in the style of events like the CCC [3]. This might seem an odd place to start, but the observation was made at the camp infrastructure talk, where they described how fibre was run a few hundred meters along fences to the nearby business park and between the Datenklos [4], that very few, by an order of magnitude, people chose to avail themselves of the ethernet, preferring instead to use the wireless. Markedly different proportions to similar events on the continent. Why should this matter? It doesn't, really, but it is suggestive of a different distribution of relationships to infrastructure among the attendees. Ethernet, with public addresses and possibilities of fancier things is something you can build with, something not commonly available to most attendees. Edge wireless, not so much. If you like to be in control of your own computing and means of communication, the utility of higher grade infrastructure is evident, even if only for a weekend. If, on the other hand, computing consists for you in placing faith in Other People's Computers wrapped in clouds of Terms & Conditions, you might not know what to do with a real connection to the rest of the Internet. The Internet itself, the very means by which we communicate, the medium in which we spend so much of our lives, and which is still open for anyone to participate on a fundamental level, is evidently uninteresting to most of the campers, which is itself an interesting observation given the purported demographic of those present. The Sponsors ------------ The headline sponsor of the event was Microsoft. No longer quite so dangerous a monopoly as in the past, they are hardly the hacker's friend. Yes, it costs money to put on an event of this scale, but there are other ways. When we see articles such as this one [5] about facial and emotion perception technology being promoted for use at political events by the main sponsor of a "Hacker Camp" the best that can be hoped is that the organizers -- and attendees -- were naive and duped into assisting with the whitewashing of such things that should have been odious to everyone present. But then, we must remember that the EMF Camp is "a camping festival for those with an inquisitive mind or an interest in making things" [6]. Ethics doesn't enter into it. For the first time at an event like this, I felt marketed at. Let me explain. The conference badge, like at similar events, is an electronic gadget [7]. It is pretty cool, has a beefy processor (by microcontroller standards), plenty of peripherals for I/O, is a Free Hardware design and runs Free Software. It seems particularly good as a teaching tool for python programming and interacting with the world. But there was a problem [8]. The organisers ran short of funds and were relying on sponsorship rather than ticket sales to fund the badge, it was nearly cancelled. That would have been a shame. At the last minute, several sponsors, including Microsoft, stepped in [9]. One of the sponors was Nexmo (Vonage). Vonage is a behemoth of the Voice-over-IP industry and to those of us who have worked in the field are known for vendor lock-in and preventing interesting and innovative use of their service by taking measures to prevent use of other than the supplied hardware. Nexmo seems a little bit of a departure, offering some access to the underlying telephone network facilities in a pre-packaged sort of way. Not nearly so useful as providers that will give you more raw access, but not especially problematic in itself. The badge came with a program called "Messages". That sounds cool. Perhaps it would be possible to send messages between badges at the camp. Nexmo even provisioned it with a phone number, even cooler, right? Unfortunately not. The program is recieve-only, so you must have and use a mobile to send messages to it (for which Nexmo gets a cut of the charges, and usefully for marketing a list of attendee's mobile numbers for those that choose to try it). There is no way to send a message from the badge even locally within the camp, though that would not have costed a dime. With a little bit of effort, perhaps an afternoon of programming, and a paid subscription to the sponsor, it could be made to work though. Great. The Photography --------------- Unusually for a hacker camp, however consistent with a lack of explicit ethical statement and a major sponsor pushing surveillance technology, there was no policy on photography. Personally, I do not have any strong objection to being photographed, but it's polite to ask. It is a standard thing at such events to have a social norm of asking, and many people think it is invasive to photograph them without asking. Sometimes this is even enforced quite strictly. When I brought this up with one of the organisers, he recognised the concern, but thought it would be a shame not to document the festival. This is true. Photographs can be valuable aide-memoirs. But it is also valuable to have temporary autonomous zones with different social conventions and without having to think about what may end up in a "social" network feed some time in the future. I'm honestly unsure of what the right balance here. Certainly the sign in the child area warning that your children would be photographed and video taped was beyond the pale regardless of whether that was the "contractor's thing" or not. And why do we, as a community, need contractors to care for our children anyways? That suggests a serious problem with hackerdom in the UK at least if that is the case. Epilogue -------- Reading over what I have written, it is more negative than I thought it would be, and perhaps more than I intended. The camp was fun, there were lots of wonderful people and some good, even edgy, talks and the organisers put in an enormous amount of effort over many months to make it happen. However I canot shake the feeling that the ultimate effect was of a corporate-sponsored simulacrum of a hacker camp. Which is a shame, but perhaps the fault lies with my expectations, that I was expecting the EMF Camp to be something that it is not. [1]: https://emfcamp.org/ [2]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Loseley_Park [3]: https://events.ccc.de/category/camp/ [4]: https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Datenklo [5]: https://theintercept.com/2016/08/04/microsoft-pitches-technology-that-can-read-facial-expressions-at-political-rallies/ [6]: https://wiki.emfcamp.org/wiki/Electromagnetic_Field_2016 [7]: https://badge.emfcamp.org/wiki/TiLDA_MK3 [8]: http://blog.emfcamp.org/post/144514906298/tilda-mk%CF%80-the-hackable-conference-badge-that [9]: http://blog.emfcamp.org/post/145667126793/the-emf-tilda-badge-is-saved [10]: https://www.nexmo.com/ # distributed via <nettime>: no commercial use without permission # <nettime> is a moderated mailing list for net criticism, # collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets # more info: http://mx.kein.org/mailman/listinfo/nettime-l # archive: http://www.nettime.org contact: nettime@kein.org # @nettime_bot tweets mail w/ sender unless #ANON is in Subject: