| Alan Sondheim on Sun, 6 May 2018 05:19:49 +0200 (CEST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
| <nettime> here we go again - |
From MAILER-DAEMON@mx.kein.org Sat May 5 23:15:44 2018
Date: Sat, 5 May 2018 23:15:41
From: Mail Delivery System <MAILER-DAEMON@mx.kein.org>
To: sondheim@panix.com
Subject: Undelivered Mail Returned to Sender
This is the mail system at host mx.kein.org.
I'm sorry to have to inform you that your message could not
be delivered to one or more recipients. It's attached below.
For further assistance, please send mail to postmaster.
If you do so, please include this problem report. You can
delete your own text from the attached returned message.
The mail system
<nettime@kein.org> (expanded from <nettime-l@mail.kein.org>): can't create user
output file
[ Part 2: "Delivery report" ]
Reporting-MTA: dns; mx.kein.org
X-Postfix-Queue-ID: B0F7C122686A
X-Postfix-Sender: rfc822; sondheim@panix.com
Arrival-Date: Sun, 6 May 2018 05:15:40 +0200 (CEST)
Final-Recipient: rfc822; nettime@kein.org
Original-Recipient: rfc822;nettime-l@mail.kein.org
Action: failed
Status: 5.2.0
Diagnostic-Code: x-unix; can't create user output file
[ Part 3: "Undelivered Message" ]
Date: Sat, 5 May 2018 23:15:34
From: Alan Sondheim <sondheim@panix.com>
To: Heiko Recktenwald <heikorecktenwald@googlemail.com>
Cc: nettime-l@mail.kein.org
Subject: Re: <nettime> please read - and how can this possibly be combatted?
On Sat, 5 May 2018, Heiko Recktenwald wrote:
Alan, Am 05/05/18 um 04:53 schrieb Alan Sondheim:Isnt that in the story of the Tower of Babel? Maybe we should read it again.or the opposite, every thing and every one speaking exactly the same digital terrain, the same protocols. even in one of 'my' areas of interest, non-western instrumentation, the well-tempered western scale and accompanying musics have been increasingly dominant.But isnt this allready the end? The same protocols and no content. Well tempered.
flat, absorbed -
less pessimistic. What is that "knowledge" of fb? Cant we laugh about it? And what is new in our "mass-psychology"? What people may do one day? A question of speed?depends on what knowledge or knowledging of fb one's concerned with -For marketing it may be better than nothing. But the rest is speculation.
it's the carapace that surrounds the user on Fb; there's very little control over appearance; the settings are a joke. it's designed for data-mining - almsot impossible for example to keep 'recent' from 'top' in the feed - the latter already shaping one's perception of one's personal sphere. there's also constant attempts to mine phone numbers and to give fb control of the computer - repeatedly asking if it can add notifications to your screen even when the medium's closed - which creates the constant presence of fb, no matter what.
There are some problems of dataownership that have mostly to do with sharing that data. What did Cambridge do wrong? They didnt pay. As if science would not be free.That Robert Mercer wrote an email in january that sounded very much like Timothy Leary... "Question authority"... Some of the opening questions of that Zuckerberg hearing were very good.
Unfortunately didn't hear this -
Feinstein was very stupid. I like those details. Maybe a starter in the time of Babel. That Donald was a present. He creates cases that we need.
He creates cases that brutally tear families apart - Best, Alan
Best, H.
New CD:- LIMIT: http://www.publiceyesore.com/catalog.php?pg=3&pit=138 email archive http://sondheim.rupamsunyata.org/ web http://www.alansondheim.org / cell 718-813-3285 current text http://www.alansondheim.org/vj.txt # distributed via <nettime>: no commercial use without permission # <nettime> is a moderated mailing list for net criticism, # collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets # more info: http://mx.kein.org/mailman/listinfo/nettime-l # archive: http://www.nettime.org contact: nettime@kein.org # @nettime_bot tweets mail w/ sender unless #ANON is in Subject: