Re: <nettime> process reporting?

[Felix Stalder via Nettime-tmp <nettime-tmp@mail.ljudmila.org>]

On 22.06.23 09:51, paul van der walt via Nettime-tmp wrote:
> I recently got a message from Jordan saying that he had heard back from 
> Rhizome, and that it wasn't going to work.  He mentioned having tried to 
> message this list, which apparently failed.

> I'd like to add to the list of options what Rich outlined IMHO extremely 
> clearly and which i remain happy to implement pretty much exactly as 
> described.  The downside of that approach is that it comes with likely 
> more up-front configuration work.  From that point of view i'd be 
> perfectly happy with Henk or Davide's offerings (they sound very 
> promising).  I guess my only concern, is having enough configuration 
> flexibility (use our domain for the mailing list, import the existing 
> archive, be able to hook up arbitrary integrations like the Twitterbot 
> should we wish, etc.). Assuming we could arrange SSH access for our 
> moderation group, so that we're less reliant on bothering those groups' 
> sysadmins whenever we need anything, that would probably be fine.

OK, so now we have three concrete proposals.

Henk (Waag.org), Davide (servus.at) and Paul. I think they are 
technically all sound and aligned with nettime culture. Maybe there is 
some room for collaboration or otherwise sharing of work loads.

all the best. Felix





--
| |||||||||||||||| http://felix.openflows.com |
| for secure communication, please use signal |
#  distributed via <nettime>: no commercial use without permission
#  <nettime>  is a moderated mailing list for net criticism,
#  collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets
#  more info: https://mail.ljudmila.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nettime-tmp
#  archive: http://www.nettime.org contact: nettime@kein.org
#  @nettime_bot tweets mail w/ sender unless #ANON is in Subject: