Elek M via nettime-l on Tue, 6 Aug 2024 08:30:57 +0200 (CEST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
<nettime> Poetry |
THE AMERICAS SOCIETY www.youtube.com/@ElekMueller-du3yp A chill passed through me. Inordinate power is absolute: in any encounter with it, every effort at movement demonstrates a lack of fear. The manipulated response by the controlled subject is the only method by which such power can know itself, as it cannot unbecome itself, once it is inordinate (power). The fingers rest at the keyboard, waiting. The brain says, Try one more time, cautiously and carefully. The fingers, delicately and imperceptibly, start to type. The inexperienced fingers of a calligrapher. The fingers stop and become motionless. The fingers have felt a strange pain. They felt it; they sent a signal to the writer's brain; the brain responded—someone is watching. They are watching the letters as they are typed. They are counting the spaces between letters, Someone is watching and measuring (monitoring). They investigate. The experienced monitors of human behavior. Skilled, they set traps for reflexes, determined to capture a thought: the thought whether they are the thought that is being thought or not. They want to make the brain think it should give up but it doesn't give up, not yet. It makes the fingers keep on typing, keep on feeling pain, the tormenting of being watched without the ability to see who or what is watching, examining, producing the shadow of a thought in the monitor, the other side of the screen in the monitor. Almost every second the fingers are sending a message to the brain. Almost every moment the brain sends a signal— watched! They are watching. Someone or something is watching, counting the weight and speed of the keys as they are pressed. I couldn't tear myself away from this spectacle, and watched, fascinated, watching my words being watched, the letters (almost) typed for me. Someone or something is watching, controlling the thought typed, its microscopic movements, responsive tremors, shaking sensitivity, until everything surrounding the one that is watched causes stress, reducing the subject to a condition of helplessness, and despair. The controlled subject must be made to believe nothing can be changed in the reality surrounding him, “and I was designated a secret prisoner.” Surveillance and domination, intimidation, enforced suggestion. An invasion [of privacy] that violates all principles of human rights. Get what they want and let the people that live there rot. “They shot at everything that moved. Everything that moved they shot.” (A worker's voice from “The Panama Deception”). “There was a case of some number but I cannot quote to you that number.” (General Thurman, on the discovery of mass graves). The commanders of commands proceeded to gather data like historical variations on the length of penises. A displacement in space and time accompanied by a process of dehumanization: the one who wanders (if he doesn't die along the way) has been stripped of human dignity. He knows now what it is to be a thing, a toy, or broken boy. For a politics of recognition based on equal dignity. “But the politics of cultural ownership . . .” The problem with a documentary photography that implements a surveillance technique, objectifying its subject, and reducing the condition of homelessness to a discrete image or portrait of destitution, hunger and poverty, without threatening either the viewer or the maker of the image. How can the art of taking and making pictures dispossess itself and represent the severity of the reduction of the barest terms of survival, the interstitial and liminal moments, a marker of the fictive limits of the political imaginary the processes of exchange and translation can barely be made still long enough to coalesce into the shape of a cultural object. The non-materiality the complexities of the interactions that can occur among the “Enlightenment logics of linear development” (“Pathfinder was born with the October Revolution”) “No code claims foundations stronger than the conviction of its followers and their determination to abide by its rules.” (Zygmunt Bauman, Intimations of Postmodernity) There are other signs are there, are there other signs? Or are there only the relations between signs? That there is no linguistic equivalence or pure transfer, “that the process of communication is always polysemic and that ‘as a result of translation terms are transformed; they no longer mean what they meant in either the source or the target language.’” “the incommensurability or the intransigence of languages” The silence of scars or leave the wound open the gaps and slants disrupting or transforming there is no mirroring back of a primary, first, original mirroring translation deepens the shadows or does the poem withdraw into an unapproachable silence? [2007-2024] The meeting: the modality of translation as being somewhere between poetry and doctrine (magnetic fields) determinate sequences the restrictive construction of a subject, ideological purity the ambiguities that separate creativity from derivation (deprivation) “when the boundaries of both languages are stretched to the point of touching" ENCOMPASSING “Just as a tangent touches a circle lightly at but one point, with this touch rather than with the point setting the law according to which it is to continue on its straight path to infinity, a translation touches the original lightly and only at the infinitely small point of the sense. . . .” (The Task of the Translator) One language kisses another “the romantic idea that creativity lies at the margins of social existence" KISSED the impermissible other from the social margins the proletarian figure (fissure) understanding as a process formed though interaction “that the ethical space of love in translation depends on recognizing the limits of equivalence” intransigence: there is no meeting place (that was not my face you . . . (that was not your face I . . . “Transparency of meaning, universal application and fixed identity are the impossible conditions upon which the language of colonial violence rests.” Transparency of meaning, universal application and fixed identity are the impossible conditions upon which the language of class violence rests. The Panama Deception directs attention to the dirty politics of empire. The duplicities and unambiguous consequences of colonialism (mass graves) The duplicities and unambiguous consequences of imperialism, the highest stage of capitalism (mass graves) MASS GRAVES with civilians in them discovered in Panama after the invasion, some of them on U.S. bases The complex patterns of cultural exchange and transformations include military invasion (economic expansion), economic exchange (privatization) and intellectual curiosity (cultural hegemony) “its calm call for tolerance as long as it maintains a distance from the conflict” The universalist (enlightenment/humanitarian) [marxist-leninist] perspective presupposes that all cultures have a common foundation and that foundation is founded on the experience of social class, articulated by the proposition that history depends on it, the proletariat, to move the nations from one form of society to a profoundly new one, where property relations are transformed, and with this change the consciousness and social relations of individuals regardless of the cultural specificity of their differences Can there be a more radical proposition than that which claims social class overcomes cultural difference, and that the relation of groups of people and collective forms of organization to the means of production determines the consciousness and social being of individuals? The Turbulence of Migration: “Class interest can no longer be raised above other social divisions like gender and race.” Race and Gender illuminate the working class. Industry created the proletariat, not philosophy. Without a concept of social class, all contingencies must remain ontological, outside history. The identity of the migrant, the stranger, the other might begin to be defined, if all identity is defined in relation to difference, by the foreigner's relation to the process of identification and entanglement, absorbing the language of another time and place, and forgetting whatever it was that once resembled a native tongue, or by making strange the language in which one happened to be born and raised, oppressed, Eyeless in Gaza, at the mill with slaves. The glaring emptiness of any concept of culture and cultural difference unaccompanied by the critical lever of the category and material substance, subsistence, insistence, called social class. The resolution of conflict intended by the discourse of cultural translation, understanding, and coexistence occludes the recognition of the need for conflict which is the terrible truth and responsibility announced in the energy with which philosophy answered history in 1848, according to Walter Benjamin. There is no nice way to phrase an accommodation to empire. In the wish for a theory of culture capable of defining the condition of its own existence without presupposing an opposition to other cultures the turning away from class conflict is proposed from within a position of being above “conflict” the material-dialectical contingencies of war. The conviction that a moral order can be built somehow outside the prerogative of the mass grave is deeply linked to the historical experience of the previous decade, whether the 21st century begins on the Road to Basra or the incineration of working class neighborhoods in Panama City in mid-December, 1989. Proletariaria 2005 THE LOGIC OF THE LONG TAKE IS THE VISION-PASSION OF THE WITNESS Cuts are obsolete. We enter the era of the long take. With digital technology, the transitory with the movie camera creates an infinite image-feed. The eye and unconscious direct the feed. Impossible to teach. Camera work that cannot be learned; it can only be suffered, undergone. Few cameras can survive acts of witness. The witnesses? They will wander into war zones, feeding the satellites with the unthinkability of absolute thresholds of destruction. Lacanian Real. The logic of the long take will not film carnage; the logic of the long take submits to carnage. The witness is the new sacrifice. Anyone with a camera can become the sufferer, casualties of war, shouldering the war-wound, (bpNichol) “martyrdom.” It is too late to renew Christianity. Hebraic? We must return to the Ancients. The logic of the long take is historical materialist. Our camera work wanders into and returns to the people the Real. A single cut suppresses the Real. Am I thinking about returning to my wandering? Fugitive notebook, place-names: Managua, Mexico City, Lodz, Warsaw, Szczecin, Berlin, Larnaca, Vilnius, Moscow, Chita, Irkutsk, Tomsk, 2004: on the long midnight road from Tomsk to Novosibirsk the North Korean scientist seated next to me in the minivan speaking fluent English, pleased to meet an “American.” Before the war, the most recent in an accelerating downward spiral like Air France Flight 447, subconsciously piloted. The logic of the long take is the antithesis of construction. The logic of the long take bleeds images. Viewers of the logic of the long take either turn away in boredom (good riddance!) or they are fascinated – Caravaggio’s Judith Beheading Holoferenes – transfixed, cannot take eyes off the Real and the martyrdom of the camera-trans. Transition: word-wounds to image-blood. My film? Look. Here is my wound. My eyes, my mind. My pain? The pain of others. Why? Because I choose not to make pain for my Other. 1990: La Malinche, Road. We are screaming each other’s names across the centuries because I am turning away to resume my wandering among the cities, the crowds, the wars, the coming revolution for peace and love. Wait, am I theorizing the vision-passion of the Witness to avoid visiting Ron Robertson, Augustana theater director, now blind, at a Sioux Falls nursing home this Tuesday? Am I trying to say to my Other, my only Reader, my greater Me, that it is time to leave the city of Omelas, wandering into Agamben’s Open, pockets empty, to and fro, across global catastrophes, like Job? Kevin Magee Mission Hill, South Dakota July 31, 2024 Sent with [Proton Mail](https://proton.me/) secure email. -- # distributed via <nettime>: no commercial use without permission # <nettime> is a moderated mailing list for net criticism, # collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets # more info: https://www.nettime.org # contact: nettime-l-owner@lists.nettime.org