MediaFilter on Wed, 14 Oct 1998 12:33:25 +0200 (MET DST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
<nettime> Surprise Attack: Re-Routing Nettime |
Re-Routing Nettime: An Exercise in Electronic Disturbance Surprise "Columbus Day Outing" By Paul Garrin Personal note: My sincerest apologies to anyone who was offended or inconvenienced by this exercise. It was not intended in any way to be malicious or aimed at any specific persons or groups in any way other than in comedic parody. Blasphemy in the face of Orthodoxy As in when Sinead O'Connor ripped up a photo of the Pope on live television. Bad PR for Sinead because she was unclear, or misunderstood. I won't allow that to happen here, although it may because some people will pre-judge and tune this out. That's their choice. Perhaps some of them already understand what this is about, although not what it appears to be on the surface. Things are not always as they seem. It's all a matter of perception, and how that perception can be "managed". Nettime was "re-routed" temporarily. It was a terribly rude intrusion that disregarded every tenent of "nettiquette". It could have been done silently, by simply opening up another channel, without the rude intrusion into the order--or what has become the "Orthodoxy of Nettime", but that would have served only to turn a blind eye and a mute tongue some of the events unfolding outside this list that have an adverse impact on all of your future access, privacy, security and autonomy online. It was an act of "Disturbance" using counterintelligence tactics to sow discord amongst a group and display its poles of affiliations and sympathies. It's to show how easy it is to do this, but no indication of how subtle something of this nature can be, so the rudeness was intended. It was a loud intrusion in many people's minds, not only because of what was sent over the open channel, but that the channel was opened in the first place without their permission. The flame-bait was a convenient element to make it as rude as possible although it wasn't directed at any one individual alone, but at the attitudes being parodied by the Nettime.Free message. Any interpretation of that information is totally up to the reader. The message was _meant_ to provoke. And what it got was the expected chain reaction of pettiness and insults in return. A very funny assortment of stuff, I must say. Another attempt to deconstruct this event may contain some of those responses, perhaps even as rendered by antiorp ;-) so he can print it out and hang it all over some wall that he's trying to climb to get noticed in the "artworld". (I forgive the kid--he's young and everybody wants to be famous). This call to action is a wake up call, in the spirit of Electronic Disturbance. A "weekend outing", a "Columbus Day Raid" The insulting tone of the list was the "agent provocateur" whose mission it was to sow discord even if it meant drawing fire. (I didn't try very hard to cover my tracks. In fact, I didn't.) I just switched on the server and left it alone, while inadvertently leaving the subciribe commands disabled...and the server ran away! Sorry about that. Hope the few extra messages in your mailbox didn't ruin your day. If it did, then please, log out and go out and take a walk, you've been online too long. Rerouting Nettime was a staged "exercise" as an "operation" using an emotional trigger...otherwise known as a "Psychological Operation" or PsyOps. In this case, it was insulting implications about members of the Nettime Moderation Team, and the users having information "forced" upon them without their choice. Some people call it "dirty tricks". That's what it was. You have to experience dirty tricks so you can begin to understand them. One of the purposes of this exercise was to personalize an experience within a fairly large and somewhat diverse group and exploit the differences. The scenario involved several elements: Identify a target group: Nettime Identify discordant issues: Moderation, Moderators, Ideologies Identify sympathetic affiliations: pro moderation/con moderation Identify exploitable conditions: subscribers complain about moderation Provoke confrontation: Clone the list and run it on another server that is not managed by the moderators thereby removing their control over content flow although the list itself has not changed. Use a provocative message to polarize the group. This resulted in opposing elements aligning in blocks defining further affiliations and sympathies. Unforseen elements subscription requests proc inadvertently disabled introduce added resulted in loss of subscriber control and chaos added to the outrage when users could not "unsubscribe" This leads to speculation and rumors about the list operator and his intentions, and insults and insinuations are spread. Intended result: it calls into question many issues concerning current events that effect our access, privacy, and autonomy on the internet and many are turning a blind eye just when issues are being decided behind closed doors which will affect thier future access, privacy, security, and autonomy on the net and probably off the net as well. It's time to focus on strategies that will educate and empower each other to protect our future of free choice and free will, and not a time to sink into complacency and inaction. The beginning of discussion and action. For more dirty tricks, please see: http://info.war/uncensored http://infowar.net/uncensored --- # distributed via nettime-l : no commercial use without permission # <nettime> is a closed moderated mailinglist for net criticism, # collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets # more info: majordomo@desk.nl and "info nettime-l" in the msg body # URL: http://www.desk.nl/~nettime/ contact: nettime-owner@desk.nl