James Love on Wed, 10 Mar 1999 19:38:38 +0100 (CET) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
<nettime> Richard Stallman's Interoperability remedies for Microsoft |
[orig to: RANDOM-BITS <random-bits@essential.org>] The following are some of Richard Stallman's suggested remedies for Microsoft. Richard is the inventor of the copyleft license and the founder of the free software movement. His suggestions largely address interoperability issues. Jamie Subject: Re: Which Remedies? Appraising Microsoft II -- on April 30, 1999 Date: Tue, 9 Mar 1999 00:13:34 -0700 (MST) From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org> To: love@cptech.org References: 1 , 2 , 3 [snip] But here are some proposed remedies. Here is a draft of a list of proposed remedies. Any comments or suggestions? * Require Microsoft to publish complete documentation of all interfaces between software components, all communications protocols, and all file formats. To make this really stick, Microsoft should not be allowed to use an NDA with some other organization to excuse implementing a secret interface. The rule must be: if they cannot publish the interface, they cannot release an implementation of it! There could be an exception permitting Microsoft to begin implementation of an interface before the publication of the interface specs, provided that they do not release the implementation until the specs are published. * Require Microsoft to use all its patents for defense only, in the field of software. (If they happen to own patents that apply to other fields, perhaps those other fields would be exempt from the requirement.) They could have the option of either using self-defense or mutual defense. Self defense: cross-license all patents at no charge with anyone who asks. Mutual defense: license all patents to a pool which anyone can join--even people who have no patents of their own. The pool licenses all members' patents to all members. * Require Microsoft not to certify any hardware as working with Microsoft software, unless the hardware's complete specifications have been published, so that any programmer can implement software to support the same hardware. -- James Love, Director, Consumer Project on Technology P.O. Box 19367, Washington, DC 20036 http://www.cptech.org love@cptech.org Voice 202.387.8030, Fax 202.234.5176 --- # distributed via nettime-l : no commercial use without permission # <nettime> is a closed moderated mailinglist for net criticism, # collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets # more info: majordomo@desk.nl and "info nettime-l" in the msg body # URL: http://www.desk.nl/~nettime/ contact: nettime-owner@desk.nl