David Garcia on 13 Jan 2001 11:00:25 -0000 |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
[Nettime-bold] Re: <nettime> don't Disassociate Webdesign (as an aspect of appengineering) from Usability |
This thread might benefit from Geert's mother tongue. In Dutch the English word designer has two possible translations one is 'ontwerper' the maker or planner and the other is 'vormgever' literally form-giver. Vormgever is, I think, generally taken to mean the visualization or imaging side of design and ontwerper might be taken to deal with the broader interpretations of what design might imply that go way beyond the visual. One of the main characteristics of 'interaction design' (which is how one might characterize the best webdesign) is that it goes beyond issues of appearance or content to include the design of 'behavior'. The behavior of the whole system including the visitor. Visitors behave differently and have different needs and the best web objects are able to 'behave' accordingly in different ways. At best they should be a tools or toys, not only a spectacles. Visualising this process in ways that make the behavioral aspect of design an accessable reality represents, I think, the true potential of responsive animation tools like flash. Example? I have been coordinating an EU project which links very diverse organisations, with often conflicting cultures. i.e. academics, artists, designers (dread word), software developers, corporations..etc. This diversity makes meaningful synthesis very hard to arrive at. With English company Audiorom I have been developing a site in which the many papers delivered at CIRCUS meetings in recent years are organized in a data base which is visualized as an interface. The aim is to help those involved (and visitors) to organize the documents in different clusters of thought. <http://www.audiorom.com/clients/circus/> (any feedback welcome). I think that the results show both 'design' and 'engineering' working together to create an interesting tool for visualizing the clustering of of thought processes. It is just a start. And this is a protype.. there is much that has to be improved on the site which we will make more public later this month. But I think that this approach could be useful maybe even for visualizing nettime threads. And helping to refute the false dichotomy between text and moving image. David Garcia ---------- >From: "geert lovink" <geert@xs4all.nl> >To: "Nettime" <nettime-l@bbs.thing.net> >Subject: Re: <nettime> don't Disassociate Webdesign (as an aspect of app engineering) from Usability >Date: Thu, Jan 11, 2001, 23:17 > > With my original posting I did not want to dump on web design, nor did I > want to glorify it. What I pointed at is a widespread attempt within the > (new) media industries to limit the creative work of web designers within > standardized templates. There is a total victory of the portal aesthetics > (which in my view even extends to slashdot, the cnn for geeks). I think that > the ascii text-only lovers should not take the side of the web barons. > Instead, we should open new windows of dialogue and collaboration between > code/text writers on the one and the flash-oriented web design community on > the other hand. Flash is not anti text. It takes the web in a whole > different direction altogether, from the still image to animation and > eventually (interactive) film. To accuse people experimenting with the > moving image of being regressive, both in terms of technology and (social) > usability, only further widens the gap between the worlds of code and image. > Film and animation over the last hundred years have been fantastic tools to > tell stories. The fact that most flash animations are empty and meaningless > is not an indication of its conceptual weakness. It rather reflects the > deeply boring age we are stuck in, deeply devided disciplines and tribes, > all producing their own perfect self-referential worlds. > > # distributed via <nettime>: no commercial use without permission > # <nettime> is a moderated mailing list for net criticism, > # collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets > # more info: majordomo@bbs.thing.net and "info nettime-l" in the msg body > # archive: http://www.nettime.org contact: nettime@bbs.thing.net > _______________________________________________ Nettime-bold mailing list Nettime-bold@nettime.org http://www.nettime.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nettime-bold