Keith Sanborn on 15 Nov 2000 16:11:40 -0000 |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: <nettime> The cultural bias of translating programs |
I think there's a bit more involved than dictionary tweaking in translation programs, although it does explain the French/English vs. Portuguese/English example fairly well. The problem, of course, is what one understands by a dictionary, which as Julian Dibbel is highly labor intensive. What there is more to it than dictionary tweaking is the level of complexity of natural languages, limitations in computing power, and the fact that languages mutate in ways that may not be able to be accounted for for some time if ever. In a way, it's still like a bunch of very gifted monkeys (the tweakers) with typewriters. How many would it take how long to produce a decent "dictionary" i.e. a set of fairly reliable correlations between two natural languages and a set of algorithms for parsing texts in those languages which would allow the dictionaries to be applied. I think the rules for parsing natural languages are extraordinarily complex. One might argue that the level of artificial stupidity produced by translation programs is a good measure of just how distant we are from making an adequate machine based account of human intelligence. In addition, it is very difficult to account for the cultural history built into a natural language which is what makes dictionary reading so wonderful in the first place. Finally, our dictionary tweakers are very much in the position currently of Flaubert's Bouvard and Pecuchet. No matter how much they copy and transcribe they will never render anything but an aburdly literal account of things. And evern if they were successful temporarily, unless their parsing engines were extremely intelligent--in fact self-modifying--they would be, as Saussure described Esperanto--like a duck trying to hatch a hen's egg. You can never step into the same river of language twice. Keith Sanborn On Tue, 14 Nov 2000, Julian Dibbell wrote: <....> # distributed via <nettime>: no commercial use without permission # <nettime> is a moderated mailing list for net criticism, # collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets # more info: majordomo@bbs.thing.net and "info nettime-l" in the msg body # archive: http://www.nettime.org contact: nettime@bbs.thing.net