Re: <nettime> process reporting?

[Felix Stalder via Nettime-tmp <nettime-tmp@mail.ljudmila.org>]

On 29.05.23 18:07, Geoffrey Goodell via Nettime-tmp wrote:
> I cannot speak for others, but I consider ultimatums and timelines to be rude.
>
> There is legitimate reason to believe that someone is about to use the nuclear
> option, to unilaterally shut down the list operations because, for whatever
> reason, none of the proposals seemed satisfactory.  I believe that Felix said
> 'end of June'.  Do you suppose that if none of the proposals please him, that
> he might decide to exercise force on the first of July?
>
> Can you provide us with an assurance that this will not happen?

Hi Geoff,

my intention was not to be rude, or find a pretext to delete the list, 
but to focus the discussion. I really want to process to happen and in 
the past, we when we raised this issue, there was some commotion which 
eventually died down and nothing would change.

I chose "one month" as deadline thinking it was the sweet spot between 
"this is urgent" and "let's take some time to find a good new home/crew".

I don't think more time would make this easier, but the deadline is 
supposed to be helpful, not written in stone.


all the best. Felix



--
| |||||||||||||||| http://felix.openflows.com |
| for secure communication, please use signal |
#  distributed via <nettime>: no commercial use without permission
#  <nettime>  is a moderated mailing list for net criticism,
#  collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets
#  more info: https://mail.ljudmila.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nettime-tmp
#  archive: http://www.nettime.org contact: nettime@kein.org
#  @nettime_bot tweets mail w/ sender unless #ANON is in Subject: